Workers Compensation Insurance (California)
Everything BestInsurance Research holds on workers compensation insurance (california): 67 cited checks, 2 answered questions, 2 worked examples and 64 source records carrying 439 recorded claims. Free to read, no account, nothing to fill in.
Read the line, not just the index
Workers Compensation Insurance (California)
The reference page: what it covers, what it excludes, what goes wrong, and what an underwriter asks. Every statement cited.
Workers Compensation Insurance (California) guide
The same evidence arranged for a first encounter with the line, in eight deep-linkable sections.
67 checks that bear on this line
These are the deterministic checks the worksheets run. Each one cites the source it rests on, so a check is readable as a published rule whether or not you ever open the worksheet. Nothing is submitted and no field you type leaves your browser.
Contract Insurance Requirements
The general aggregate limit you recorded is lower than the general aggregate the contract requires.
This is a straight arithmetic comparison of the two numbers you entered. The general aggregate is the most the policy pays in the policy period across all occurrences, and it is a separate figure from the per occurrence limit.
The per occurrence limit you recorded is lower than the per occurrence limit the contract requires.
This is a straight arithmetic comparison of the two numbers you entered. The ISO commercial general liability form states the each occurrence limit as the most it will pay for any one occurrence, and states the general aggregate as a separate figure. Nothing here says what this contract's wording accepts.
The contract asks for a general aggregate that is lower than the per occurrence limit it asks for in the same clause.
An aggregate below the per occurrence figure is internally inconsistent, because the aggregate caps the total that the per occurrence limit can ever draw on. This is usually a drafting slip in the exhibit rather than a real requirement.
The automobile liability limit you recorded is lower than the automobile limit the contract requires.
Contract automobile requirements are commonly written as a combined single limit and are a separate figure from the state minimum financial responsibility amount. The two numbers you entered do not match.
The umbrella or excess limit you recorded is lower than the umbrella limit the contract requires.
The comparison is arithmetic on the two figures you entered. An umbrella sits above named underlying policies, so both the amount and the list of underlying policies it sits over are part of what the clause is asking for.
The professional liability limit you recorded is lower than the professional liability limit the contract requires.
Public and institutional contracts frequently set the professional liability figure separately from general liability, and the two limits respond to different allegations. The numbers you entered do not match.
The employers liability limit you recorded is lower than the employers liability limit the contract requires.
Employers liability is a limit on the workers compensation policy and is distinct from the statutory benefits the policy pays. The two figures you entered do not match.
The contract requires additional insured status but you have not recorded that any additional insured endorsement is confirmed on your policy.
Additional insured status is created by an endorsement attached to the policy, such as the scheduled owners, lessees or contractors forms, and the scope differs between form numbers and editions. A tick on a certificate does not itself add anyone to a policy.
The contract requires additional insured status for completed operations but you have not recorded that a completed operations additional insured endorsement is confirmed.
Ongoing operations and completed operations additional insured wordings are different endorsements, and a form that covers only ongoing operations stops responding once the work is finished.
The contract requires a waiver of subrogation but you have not recorded that a waiver endorsement is confirmed on your policy.
A waiver of subrogation is a specific endorsement giving up the insurer's right to recover from the other party, and public entities that require it commonly publish the endorsement forms they will accept. Naming it in a contract does not put it on a policy.
The contract requires your coverage to be primary and non-contributory but you have not recorded that a primary and non-contributory endorsement is confirmed.
How a policy shares with other insurance is set by its other insurance condition, and changing that order takes an endorsement written for the purpose. Some additional insured forms carry the wording and some do not.
The contract requires advance notice of cancellation to the other party but you have not recorded that any notice endorsement is confirmed.
Regulators have addressed what a certificate may and may not say about cancellation notice, and a certificate cannot create a notice obligation that the policy does not contain.
A certificate has been delivered for a contract that requires endorsements, but no endorsement forms went with it.
A certificate of insurance is a summary that does not amend, extend or alter the policy, and regulators are explicit that it confers no rights by itself.
The contract requires endorsements but you do not hold your own copy of the endorsement forms.
The endorsement form and its edition date are what a later dispute will turn on, and different editions of the same form number read differently. Without the form you cannot check the wording against the clause.
You have marked that you hold nothing in writing from the insurer confirming the endorsements this contract requires.
Certificate guidance from state regulators treats the certificate as informational only, so written confirmation from the insurer is the record that the endorsements exist.
You have signed the agreement but do not hold your own copy of the fully signed document.
Every insurance requirement in this module is read off the contract, and underwriting and claims files routinely ask for the contract and its insurance exhibit.
The date you delivered evidence of insurance is later than the date the contract set for delivering it.
This is date arithmetic on the two dates you entered. Contracts and public entity requirements commonly condition the right to begin work, or to be paid, on evidence arriving by the stated date.
Your work start date falls before the date the contract sets for delivering evidence of insurance.
The dates you entered put boots on the ground before the evidence is due, which leaves the period between the two with nothing on file with the other party.
The agreement is signed and no evidence of insurance has been delivered yet.
You have recorded the agreement as signed and no evidence of insurance delivered. The endorsements this module asks about are changes only the insurer can make, so they have to be requested and confirmed before a certificate can honestly describe them, and a certificate is informational and does not itself amend or extend the policy. This rule says nothing about what your signature has already obliged you to do or from when.
The retroactive date on your claims-made professional liability policy is later than the date your work under this contract starts.
A claims-made policy responds by reference to its retroactive date, so work performed before that date sits outside the period the policy describes. The two dates you entered are in the wrong order.
The work includes design or consulting services and you have recorded no professional liability policy in force.
General liability forms carry exclusions aimed at professional services, including designated professional services and contractors professional liability wordings, so the two coverages respond to different allegations.
The contract names a professional liability limit and you have recorded no professional liability policy in force.
The clause asks for a coverage you have not recorded, and public bodies publish their professional liability clauses as separate requirements precisely because general liability does not answer them.
The contract names an employers liability limit and you have recorded no workers compensation policy in force.
California requires employers to secure the payment of compensation by one of the specified methods, and licensing bodies check the certificate as a condition of doing the work. Whether the people doing this work are employees for the purposes of that duty turns on the Labor Code definitions, and section 3352 sets out who is excluded from the statutory definition of employee. That is a legal reading of statute, not something this module can settle.
The contract requires workers compensation evidence, which raises a question about how the work under it is classified on your policy.
Classification and payroll assignment are decided under a published classification system administered by the rating organisation and the insurer, not by the contract.
The contract contains an indemnity, hold harmless or duty to defend obligation, and how far it reaches is a legal question.
Statute limits certain indemnity provisions in construction contracts, and the effect of particular wording is a matter of law rather than of what any policy says. An insurance policy and a contractual indemnity are separate promises.
This is California-governed construction work with an indemnity obligation, which is the situation the indemnity statutes address directly.
Civil Code section 2782 addresses indemnity provisions in construction contracts and section 2782.05 addresses provisions purporting to make a subcontractor insure or indemnify another party for that party's own conduct. Whether this specific wording falls inside those sections is a legal reading, not a rules question.
You have recorded that the indemnity expressly reaches the other party's own active negligence or wilful misconduct.
That is the category of provision the California indemnity statutes speak to, including provisions that attempt to reach an indemnitee's own conduct. Nothing in an insurance module can tell you whether such a clause holds.
You marked the reach of the indemnity clause as unclear, which means the obligation you would be taking on is unknown to you.
The reach of an indemnity is what determines what you have promised beyond your policy, and statute constrains some of these provisions in construction contracts.
The contract requires a performance bond and you have recorded that no surety has executed one.
A bond is a three party undertaking involving a surety, and it is a different instrument from an insurance policy, with its own application and underwriting process.
This is a government or public entity contract of substantial value and you have recorded that no bond is required.
Federal construction contracting has statutory bond requirements above published dollar thresholds, and state and local bodies set their own. Worth checking that the solicitation documents match what you were handed.
The contract requires a contractor license bond and you have recorded that none has been executed.
A contractor license bond is a licensing instrument filed with the licensing board and is separate from any contract specific performance or payment bond.
You have recorded that the evidence does not name the other party exactly as the contract names them.
Certificate guidance from state regulators treats the named holder and named insureds as matters of what the policy and endorsements actually say, and a mismatch between the contract's named parties and the evidence is a question to resolve before it becomes a dispute.
The contract asks for endorsements and you have marked that none of them has been confirmed.
Every endorsement this section asks about is a change to the policy that only the insurer can make, and none of them exist because a contract or a certificate says so.
Workers Compensation Classification
You recorded California payroll, so the classification wording that applies to you comes from California's own bureau-administered system and not from the NCCI manual used in most other states.
California operates a standard classification system administered by an independent rating bureau under a plan filed with the state insurance regulator, and that plan sets the classification and payroll reporting rules for California payroll. NCCI publishes the separate classification assignment rules used across the states it serves, and the same described work can sit under differently worded classifications in the two systems.
You recorded a single employee or crew generating payroll in more than one state, which means more than one set of classification and payroll rules is being applied to the same people.
California payroll is governed by the California plan filed with the state regulator, while NCCI states apply NCCI's own classification assignment rules. Where the same worker crosses a state line, how the payroll is allocated between systems is a rules question with a written answer, not a matter of preference.
You recorded more than one distinct activity, which raises a classification question this instrument will not answer for you.
Classification is assigned according to the business the employer conducts, and the applicable manual rules govern whether one classification or several apply and when a separate classification is permitted. Nothing here assigns a code; only the bureau whose system applies and the insurer writing the policy do that.
You recorded more distinct activities than there are classifications on the policy.
This is arithmetic on your own two entries: the count of activities you recorded exceeds the count of classifications you said appear on the policy. Whether that is correct depends on the manual rules on assignment of classifications and on when payroll may be divided, which this instrument does not apply.
You pay subcontractors and hold no certificates of insurance for them, which is an unresolved audit exposure.
A certificate of insurance is the document ordinarily requested to evidence that another firm carried its own coverage, and public regulators describe it as the standard evidence document exchanged between hiring parties. Where that evidence is absent for a period, the payroll reporting and audit rules on uninsured subcontracted work are what govern the outcome, and your records currently do not answer them.
You hold subcontractor certificates for only some subcontractors or some periods, so part of your subcontract spend is undocumented.
Certificates are period-specific evidence, and a certificate that lapsed mid-project does not document the later months. The gaps, not the files you already have, are what an audit of subcontracted payroll will turn on under the applicable payroll reporting rules.
Your subcontractor payments are in the largest band you could select while your certificate file is incomplete.
The size of the undocumented spend is the size of the question an auditor will ask, and the payroll reporting rules on subcontracted work are applied to the amounts paid. The certificate is the ordinary evidence document.
Your payroll records carry one figure per employee and do not show which activity the pay was earned in.
Dividing a single employee's payroll between classifications is permitted only where the employer's records meet the standard the applicable rules set for verifiable division, and the California plan and the NCCI rule both address division of payroll and the records it requires. Records that cannot support a division cannot be repaired retroactively at audit.
You recorded more than one activity but said you could not state the payroll for each activity in writing today.
These two answers cannot both be comfortable: the classification rules that decide whether separate treatment applies depend on payroll figures per activity, and an application or audit will ask for exactly the split you just said you do not have.
You recorded clerical or office work and also said office employees perform non-clerical duties.
Classification rules treat office and clerical work as a separately described exposure with conditions attached to it, and the rules on assignment and on division of payroll are what determine how a mixed-duty employee is handled. This instrument does not resolve that; it flags that the two answers you gave sit in tension.
You recorded an audit or records-request date while your payroll records still carry one figure per employee.
The date you entered is fixed and the records question is the one the audit turns on, since division of payroll depends on records that existed during the period being audited, not on figures assembled afterwards.
You recorded the date of a written notice of a classification or rating change, and the California route for challenging how the rating system was applied begins with a written request for review to the insurer or rating organization.
California Insurance Code section 11737 provides that every insurer or rating organization shall provide reasonable means whereby any person aggrieved by the application of its filings may be heard by the insurer or rating organization on written request to review the manner in which the rating system has been applied, that any party affected by the action of the insurer or rating organization on the request may appeal, within 30 days after written notice of the action, to the commissioner, and that if the insurer or rating organization fails to grant or reject the request within 30 days the applicant may proceed in the same manner as if the application had been rejected. The 30 day appeal period in that section is measured from written notice of their action on the request, not from the change notice date you entered. Related sections address the rating systems insurers file and apply, and the department publishes its own contact routes.
You recorded the date of written notice of the insurer's or rating organization's action on your request to review how the rating system was applied, which is the date the cited 30 day appeal period is measured from.
California Insurance Code section 11737 provides that any party affected by the action of the insurer or rating organization on the request may appeal, within 30 days after written notice of the action, to the commissioner, who after a hearing may affirm, modify, or reverse that action. The date you entered is that written notice date, so 30 days from it is the outer marker the section states; the department publishes its own contact routes.
The audit or records-request date you entered falls before the policy effective date you entered.
This is pure date arithmetic on your two entries and one of them is wrong, or the audit relates to an earlier policy period than the one you recorded. Which period is being audited determines which records and which classifications are in scope.
You recorded a policy effective date but do not hold the current experience rating worksheet.
Experience rating operates on reported payroll and losses over defined past periods and the resulting worksheet is issued and can be revised on a schedule tied to the policy anniversary. Reading it after the effective date you entered leaves no time to question the data it was built from.
You know your experience modification number but do not hold the worksheet it came from.
The worksheet is the document that shows which payroll and which claims produced the number, and the rating systems describe how that data is used and revised. Without it you cannot check whether the underlying data is right.
You do not hold loss runs covering the last five policy years.
Loss runs are the insurer-produced record of claims and reserves, and they are the document against which the payroll and claim data on an experience rating worksheet can be checked.
You recorded workers compensation benefits coverage but did not record employers liability coverage.
The state insurance department's own guide to workers compensation describes the benefits coverage and the employers liability coverage as separate parts of the policy responding to different things. Nothing here says whether any particular claim would be paid; the open item is that one of the two parts is simply not written down in your position.
You recorded payroll in more than one state but no other states or all states endorsement is recorded on the policy.
A workers compensation policy is written against named states, and the state insurance department's guide describes the policy as tied to the states scheduled on it. The recorded gap is between the states you listed and what your position says is scheduled.
You pay individual workers as independent contractors, which raises a statutory employment status question this instrument will not answer.
Whether a worker is an employee for workers compensation purposes is set by statute and by the definitions the labor code applies, not by how the worker is paid or what a contract calls them. This is a legal determination with consequences that are not insurance consequences.
You obtain workers through a staffing agency, labor contractor or PEO and nothing in your position records who carries their coverage.
Who is the employer of a supplied worker for workers compensation purposes turns on statutory definitions and on the arrangement itself, and the evidence document ordinarily exchanged for such arrangements is a certificate of insurance. Neither is recorded here.
You recorded that you supply your own workers to work under someone else's direction, which is a described activity with its own classification and employment questions.
Supplying labor to others raises both a classification wording question under the applicable manual rules and a statutory question about who the employer is. Those are two different professionals' answers.
The classifications on your policy were carried over from a prior policy or you do not know where they came from.
Classification is assigned under the rules of the system that applies, and those rules describe who assigns and on what basis. A classification that was correct for an earlier version of the business is not evidence that it is correct for the current one.
The operations have changed since the last renewal or application, which is a change to the description the classifications were built on.
Classifications are assigned against the business the employer conducts, so a change in what the business does is a change in the input, and the payroll reporting rules apply to the operations as actually conducted.
A prior audit already moved payroll between classifications, and your records still do not fully separate activities by employee.
The same records question that produced the earlier reclassification is still open, and the rules on division of payroll turn on records kept during the period.
A prior audit billed additional premium and you have recorded at least one records or certificate gap that is still open.
Additional premium at audit follows from what the records and the payroll reporting rules produced for the audited period. The point of noting it here is that the same input is still unfixed.
Overtime wages are not recorded separately from regular wages in your records.
Payroll reporting rules address how remuneration is measured and what records the employer must be able to show, including the treatment of overtime. Where the records do not separate it, the question cannot be answered from your own books.
Owner, partner or executive officer pay is mixed into employee payroll in your records.
Payroll reporting rules address how remuneration is measured and what an employer must be able to show an auditor. Records that do not identify owner and officer compensation on its own line cannot support any position on how it was reported. This is a book-keeping gap; it is not a determination of how that remuneration must be treated.
Owner, partner or executive officer pay is mixed into employee payroll, and whether an owner or officer is a statutory employee at all is a legal question this instrument will not answer.
The California labor code section that defines who is and is not an employee for workers compensation purposes sets out exclusions that turn on statutory tests, not on how the pay is booked, and the state labor agency publishes employer guidance on those obligations. Nothing here decides whether any owner or officer of your business falls inside or outside that definition.
You recorded California construction or installation work, and whether coverage is legally required of you is a statutory question rather than an insurance one.
California's labor code sets out how an employer secures the payment of compensation, the state labor agency publishes employer guidance on those obligations, and the contractor licensing board publishes its own separate requirements for licensees.
You recorded Texas payroll, and the Texas insurance department publishes employer obligations that differ from those of the other states you may operate in.
The Texas Department of Insurance publishes its own guidance for employers on workers compensation obligations, and other state agencies publish theirs. Where the answers differ by state, no single national statement is reliable for your whole program.
You recorded Florida construction work, and Florida publishes employer coverage requirements that are stated separately for construction.
The Florida Division of Workers' Compensation publishes employer coverage requirements and distinguishes industry categories in doing so. Whether your arrangement meets them is a statutory question, not a classification question.
You recorded employees and activities but nothing recorded on any policy.
How an employer secures the payment of compensation is set by statute in each state, and state agencies publish employer obligations directly. The gap here is between the payroll you recorded and the absence of anything recorded against it.
You recorded design or consulting services as well as physical work, which is two separately described exposures in one business.
The classification rules assign against the business conducted and address when more than one classification applies, and design or consulting services also raise a liability question separate from employee injury. Nothing here says what any policy responds to; the open item is that you have two questions and only one of them is a workers compensation question.
Questions this library answers on workers compensation insurance (california)
Examples touching this line
Lines that share a worksheet with this one
A worksheet that covers this line also covers these, which usually means the same decision touches all of them.
Source ledger
64 sources. Every citation number above resolves to a record below. Nothing here sits behind an account.
- [1]Commercial General Liability Coverage Form CG 00 01 04 13 (ISO)(opens the original record on Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text); published as a downloadable coverage form specimen by Berxi (Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance))Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text); published as a downloadable coverage form specimen by Berxi (Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance)Standards bodyPrimaryJurisdiction USLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: ISO revises the CGL coverage form periodically; edition dates and state-specific variants differ, and carriers may use their own non-ISO forms.ID
iso-cg-00-01-04-13What this source supports (37)
- In CG 00 01 04 13, the Coverage A insuring agreement states that the insurer will pay those sums that the insured becomes legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury or property damage to which the insurance applies, and that the insurer will have the right and duty to defend the insured against any suit seeking those damages.
- The form states that the insurer will have no duty to defend the insured against any suit seeking damages for bodily injury or property damage to which the insurance does not apply.
- The form states that the insurer's right and duty to defend ends when it has used up the applicable limit of insurance in the payment of judgments or settlements under Coverages A or B or medical expenses under Coverage C.
- Coverage A applies to bodily injury and property damage only if the injury or damage is caused by an occurrence that takes place in the coverage territory and occurs during the policy period, subject to the form's prior-knowledge provisions.
- The form defines occurrence as an accident, including continuous or repeated exposure to substantially the same general harmful conditions.
- Supplementary Payments under Coverages A and B include all expenses the insurer incurs, and the form states that these payments will not reduce the limits of insurance.
- Section III Limits Of Insurance sets a General Aggregate Limit, a Products-Completed Operations Aggregate Limit, a Personal And Advertising Injury Limit, an Each Occurrence Limit, a Damage To Premises Rented To You Limit, and a Medical Expense Limit.
- The General Aggregate Limit is the most the insurer will pay for the sum of medical expenses under Coverage C, damages under Coverage A other than damages included in the products-completed operations hazard, and damages under Coverage B.
- The Products-Completed Operations Aggregate Limit is the most the insurer will pay under Coverage A for damages because of bodily injury and property damage included in the products-completed operations hazard.
- The Each Occurrence Limit is the most the insurer will pay for the sum of damages under Coverage A and medical expenses under Coverage C because of all bodily injury and property damage arising out of any one occurrence.
- The Damage To Premises Rented To You Limit, subject to the Each Occurrence Limit, is the most the insurer will pay under Coverage A for damages because of property damage to any one premises while rented to the insured, or in the case of damage by fire, while rented to or temporarily occupied by the insured with permission of the owner.
- The Medical Expense Limit, subject to the Each Occurrence Limit, is the most the insurer will pay under Coverage C for all medical expenses because of bodily injury sustained by any one person.
- The form states that the Limits of Insurance of the Coverage Part apply separately to each consecutive annual period and to any remaining period of less than 12 months, starting with the beginning of the policy period shown in the Declarations.
- The Coverage A exclusions in CG 00 01 04 13 are lettered a. through q.: Expected Or Intended Injury; Contractual Liability; Liquor Liability; Workers' Compensation And Similar Laws; Employer's Liability; Pollution; Aircraft, Auto Or Watercraft; Mobile Equipment; War; Damage To Property; Damage To Your Product; Damage To Your Work; Damage To Impaired Property Or Property Not Physically Injured; Recall Of Products, Work Or Impaired Property; Personal And Advertising Injury; Electronic Data; and Recording And Distribution Of Material Or Information In Violation Of Law.
- The Coverage A list of exclusions in this base form does not include a professional services exclusion.
- Exclusion b. Contractual Liability removes bodily injury or property damage for which the insured is obligated to pay damages by reason of the assumption of liability in a contract or agreement, and states that the exclusion does not apply to liability for damages that the insured would have in the absence of the contract or agreement, or to liability assumed in a contract or agreement that is an insured contract, provided the bodily injury or property damage occurs subsequent to the execution of the contract or agreement.
- The form defines insured contract to include a contract for a lease of premises with a stated fire-damage carve-out, a sidetrack agreement, an easement or license agreement with a stated railroad exception, an obligation required by ordinance to indemnify a municipality with a stated exception, an elevator maintenance agreement, and that part of any other contract or agreement pertaining to the insured's business under which the insured assumes the tort liability of another party to pay for bodily injury or property damage to a third person or organization.
- Nothing in the Contractual Liability exclusion or its insured contract exception amends Section II Who Is An Insured or confers additional insured status.
- Coverage A exclusion a. Expected Or Intended Injury states, in the same paragraph, that the exclusion does not apply to bodily injury resulting from the use of reasonable force to protect persons or property.
- The insured contract exception in exclusion b. also provides that, solely for the purposes of liability assumed in an insured contract, reasonable attorneys' fees and necessary litigation expenses incurred by or for a party other than an insured are deemed to be damages because of bodily injury or property damage, provided liability for that party's defense was also assumed in the same insured contract and the fees and expenses are for defense of that party against a civil or alternative dispute resolution proceeding in which damages to which the insurance applies are alleged.
- Coverage A exclusion c. Liquor Liability removes bodily injury or property damage for which any insured may be held liable by reason of causing or contributing to the intoxication of any person, the furnishing of alcoholic beverages to a person under the legal drinking age or under the influence of alcohol, or any statute, ordinance or regulation relating to the sale, gift, distribution or use of alcoholic beverages.
- The Liquor Liability exclusion states that it applies even if the claims allege negligence or other wrongdoing in the supervision, hiring, employment, training or monitoring of others by that insured, or in providing or failing to provide transportation with respect to any person that may be under the influence of alcohol, if the occurrence involved one of the three listed grounds.
- The Liquor Liability exclusion closes with a limiting clause stating that the exclusion applies only if the named insured is in the business of manufacturing, distributing, selling, serving or furnishing alcoholic beverages, and that permitting a person to bring alcoholic beverages on the named insured's premises for consumption on those premises, whether or not a fee is charged or a license is required for that activity, is not by itself considered the business of selling, serving or furnishing alcoholic beverages.
- Coverage A exclusion e. Employer's Liability reaches bodily injury to an employee of the insured arising out of and in the course of employment by the insured or of performing duties related to the conduct of the insured's business, and to that employee's spouse, child, parent, brother or sister as a consequence, and applies whether the insured may be liable as an employer or in any other capacity and to any obligation to share damages with or repay someone else. The form then states that the exclusion does not apply to liability assumed by the insured under an insured contract.
- Coverage A exclusion f. Pollution excludes bodily injury or property damage arising out of the actual, alleged or threatened discharge, dispersal, seepage, migration, release or escape of pollutants at or from premises the insured owns, occupies, rents or borrows, and at or from premises where the insured or its contractors are performing operations if the pollutants are brought on in connection with those operations, subject to stated subparagraph exceptions.
- One stated exception to the pollution exclusion is bodily injury sustained within a building and caused by smoke, fumes, vapor or soot produced by or originating from equipment used to heat, cool or dehumidify the building.
- Exclusion f.(2) also excludes loss, cost or expense arising out of a request, demand, order or statutory or regulatory requirement that any insured or others test for, monitor, clean up, remove, contain, treat, detoxify or neutralize pollutants, or a claim or suit by or on behalf of a governmental authority for such damages.
- Exclusion f.(2) closes with a stated exception providing that the paragraph does not apply to liability for damages because of property damage that the insured would have in the absence of such request, demand, order or statutory or regulatory requirement, or of such claim or suit by or on behalf of a governmental authority.
- Coverage A exclusion k. Damage To Your Product removes property damage to the insured's product arising out of it or any part of it, and carries no stated exception in this form.
- Coverage A exclusion l. Damage To Your Work removes property damage to the insured's work arising out of it or any part of it and included in the products-completed operations hazard, and states that the exclusion does not apply if the damaged work, or the work out of which the damage arises, was performed on the named insured's behalf by a subcontractor.
- Coverage A exclusion m. Damage To Impaired Property Or Property Not Physically Injured removes property damage to impaired property or to property that has not been physically injured arising out of a defect, deficiency, inadequacy or dangerous condition in the insured's product or work, or out of a delay or failure by the insured or anyone acting on its behalf to perform a contract or agreement in accordance with its terms, and states that the exclusion does not apply to the loss of use of other property arising out of sudden and accidental physical injury to the insured's product or work after it has been put to its intended use.
- Coverage A exclusion n. Recall Of Products, Work Or Impaired Property removes damages claimed for any loss, cost or expense incurred by the insured or others for the loss of use, withdrawal, recall, inspection, repair, replacement, adjustment, removal or disposal of the insured's product, work or impaired property, and applies only if such product, work or property is withdrawn or recalled from the market or from use by any person or organization because of a known or suspected defect, deficiency, inadequacy or dangerous condition in it.
- Coverage A exclusion p. Electronic Data removes damages arising out of the loss of, loss of use of, damage to, corruption of, inability to access or inability to manipulate electronic data, and states in the same paragraph that the exclusion does not apply to liability for damages because of bodily injury.
- Coverage A exclusion i. War excludes bodily injury or property damage arising directly or indirectly out of war including undeclared or civil war, warlike action by a military force, and insurrection, rebellion, revolution, usurped power or action taken by governmental authority in hindering or defending against any of these.
- Coverage A exclusion q. excludes bodily injury or property damage arising directly or indirectly out of any action or omission that violates or is alleged to violate the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the CAN-SPAM Act of 2003, the Fair Credit Reporting Act including the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act amendment, or any other similar statute, ordinance or regulation.
- Section III Limits Of Insurance in this base form sets limits only and contains no liability deductible provision.
- Coverage B is Personal And Advertising Injury Liability, has its own limit of insurance and its own exclusions including a pollution exclusion, and Coverage C is Medical Payments, whose payments are made regardless of fault and cannot exceed the applicable limit of insurance.
Published: 2013-04
Active - [2]Commercial Insurance Guide (CDI Form 700)(opens the original record on California Department of Insurance)California Department of InsuranceRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: revised by the California Department of Insurance without a fixed schedule; the page carries the marker Form 700 Revised June 14, 2024ID
ca-cdi-commercial-insurance-guideWhat this source supports (33)
- The guide's glossary entry headed 'Claims Made' reads: a liability insurance policy where coverage applies to claims filed during the policy period no matter when the loss occurred subject to a retroactive inception date.
- The guide's glossary entry headed 'Occurrence' reads: a liability insurance policy that covers claims arising out of occurrences that take place during the policy period, regardless of when the claim is filed.
- CDI states that there are three primary coverage sections that make up a CGL policy: premises liability, products liability and completed operations.
- CDI describes CGL coverage as comprehensive in nature, covering all hazards within the scope of the insuring agreement that are not otherwise excluded.
- CDI states that the major exclusions under a CGL policy include intentional injury; insured contracts; liquor liability; workers compensation and employers liability; pollution; aircraft; automobile; watercraft; mobile equipment; war; care, custody, and control; damage to your work; impaired property; sistership liability; and failure to perform.
- CDI describes specified perils as consisting of a list of each peril to be insured against, such as fire, explosion, windstorm and vandalism, and describes open perils coverage as covering all losses unless they are specifically excluded.
- CDI states that earth movement (including earthquake) and flood are two common perils that are excluded under open perils coverage.
- CDI describes three commercial property valuation approaches: actual cash value, agreed value, which it says waives any coinsurance penalty and pays 100 percent of the stated amount, and replacement cost, which it describes as the amount it takes to replace property with new property of like kind and quality up to the limits of insurance.
- CDI describes coinsurance as an insurance clause that defines the amount of each loss the company pays according to the amount of insurance carried divided by the amount of insurance required, and states that a policyholder can be subject to a monetary penalty at the time of a loss where a building is not insured to value.
- CDI states that business interruption coverage replaces lost business income after a covered loss.
- CDI describes a Business Owners Policy (BOP) as a combination commercial policy that covers property, general liability and business interruption.
- CDI states that when a business has had three applications turned down from a licensed commercial insurance carrier, with written documentation of the declination, it can proceed to obtain insurance from the surplus line market.
- CDI states that a surplus line company can only be accessed through a specially licensed broker who holds a surplus line license issued by the CDI.
- CDI states that although surplus line insurers must follow the Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations, the CDI has limited jurisdiction over the operation of surplus line insurers.
- CDI states that the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA), which protects claims with admitted insurers, does not apply to surplus line insurers.
- There are three primary coverage sections that make up a CGL policy: premises liability, products liability and completed operations.
- Premises liability covers liability for accidental injury or property damage that results from either a condition on your premises or your operations in progress, whether on or away from your premises.
- A products liability hazard exists for any business that manufactures, sells, handles, or distributes goods or products.
- Completed operations covers your potential liability for bodily injury or property damage that arises out of your completed work.
- The CGL policy has separate limits of insurance for general liability, fire legal liability, products and completed operations liability, advertising and personal liability, and medical payments.
- The page carries the line Form 700 Revised June 14, 2024.
- The guide states that inland marine is a specialized type of property insurance that primarily covers damage to or destruction of your business property while in transport.
- The guide states that inland marine insurance can cover a variety of transportation exposures, however it does not cover boating transportation, which is covered under ocean marine insurance.
- The guide states that some of the most common types of coverage offered are accounts receivable insurance, consignment insurance, equipment floaters (i.e., contractors equipment), installation floaters, motor truck cargo insurance, trip transit insurance, and valuable papers (records) insurance.
- The guide states that standard perils in inland marine may include fire, lightning, windstorm, flood, earthquake, landslide, theft, collision, derailment, overturn of the transporting vehicle, and bridge collapse.
- The guide states that commercial property insurance can protect a business owner from some of the most common losses experienced by business owners, such as property damage, business interruption, theft, liability, and worker injury.
- The guide states that an aggregate limit of liability is in force for the general liability, fire legal liability, advertising and personal liability, and medical payments claims.
- The guide states that when total claims for all these areas exceed a stated annual aggregate limit of liability, the policy limits are exhausted and no more claims will be paid from the policy for the duration of the policy period.
- The guide states that there is also a separate aggregate limit of liability in force for products and completed operations liability claims.
- The guide defines split limits as the technique for expressing limits of liability coverage under a particular insurance policy by stating separate limits for different types of claims growing out of a single event or combination of events.
- The guide states that if a building is not insured to value the insured can be subject to a monetary penalty at the time of a loss, commonly referred to as coinsurance, and defines coinsurance as an insurance clause that defines the amount of each loss that the company pays according to the amount of insurance carried, divided by the amount of insurance required.
- The guide states that the California Insurance Guarantee Association (CIGA), which protects claims with admitted insurers, does not apply to surplus line insurers.
- The guide states that while surplus line companies are not licensed by the CDI, they do have to go through an approval process that includes providing evidence of minimum capital and surplus requirements.
Fetched 2026-08-31 and both glossary entries read off the page. The '?page=3' query parameter used in the earlier draft is inert and has been dropped from the URL. publishedDate is taken from the page's own 'Form 700 Revised June 14, 2024' marker. This is a consumer guide glossary and the weakest authority in the bundle; it is cited only for the two trigger definitions. It does not address retroactive dates, extended reporting periods, or which lines are written on which trigger. Published: 2024-06-14 Effective: 2024-06-14
Active - [3]Commercial general liability insurance (consumer publication)(opens the original record on Texas Department of Insurance)Texas Department of InsuranceRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction TXLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: TDI updates its consumer publications periodically; the page fetched on 2026-08-31 showed 'Last updated 1/20/2021'.ID
tdi-cgl-guideWhat this source supports (5)
- TDI states that occurrence policies cover claims arising from injury or damage occurring while the policy is in force, regardless of when the claim is first made.
- TDI states that claims-made policies cover claims that arise from injury or damage occurring during the policy period and reported to the insurer during the policy period.
- TDI lists common commercial general liability exclusions including damage to your work, damage to your product, contractual liability, recall of products, work, or impaired property, and workers' compensation and employer's liability, and also discusses pollution exclusions.
- Writing about surplus lines insurance, TDI states that defense costs could be included within the limit of liability, and that prior acts or run-off coverage may not be available.
- TDI advises policyholders to carefully review their policy and any endorsements to know exactly what the policy does and does not cover.
Fetched 2026-08-31; last-updated date of 1/20/2021 confirmed on the page. This is Texas regulator guidance and is cited in this bundle for how the mechanisms work, not as California law. Note that TDI's claims-made description (injury during the policy period and reported during the policy period) is narrower than the NAIC description, so the two are cited separately rather than stacked on one sentence. The page does not discuss per-occurrence versus aggregate limits or sub-limits, and is not cited for those. Published: 2021-01-20 Effective: 2021-01-20
Active - [4]Insurance Requirements - California Department of Motor Vehicles(opens the original record on California Department of Motor Vehicles)California Department of Motor VehiclesRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Re-verify annually and after each legislative session.ID
ca-dmv-insurance-requirementsWhat this source supports (2)
- The California DMV lists the current minimum liability insurance amounts as $30,000 for injury or death to one person, $60,000 for injury or death to more than one person, and $15,000 for damage to property.
- The California DMV states that the financial responsibility requirement may also be met by a $75,000 cash deposit with the DMV, by a DMV-issued self-insurance certificate, or by a $75,000 surety bond from a company licensed to do business in California.
Active - [5]Auto insurance guide (CB020) - Texas Department of Insurance(opens the original record on Texas Department of Insurance)Texas Department of InsuranceRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction TXLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: TDI revises its consumer guides periodically; re-verify annually and after each legislative session.ID
tdi-auto-guideWhat this source supports (5)
- TDI states that Texas law requires at least $30,000 of coverage for injuries per person, up to a total of $60,000 per accident, and $25,000 of coverage for property damage.
- TDI states that all auto policies in Texas include personal injury protection coverage, and that a policyholder who does not want it must tell the company in writing.
- TDI states that insurance companies must offer uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage, and that a policyholder who does not want it must tell the company in writing.
- The guide carries a last updated date of December 11, 2025.
- The guide states no effective date for the minimum amounts.
Published: 2025-12-11
Active - [6]Consumer's Guide to Commercial Liability Insurance (PI-045)(opens the original record on Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of Insurance)Wisconsin Office of the Commissioner of InsuranceRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction WILast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Revised periodically; the edition retrieved on 2026-08-31 carries the footer PI-045 (R 08/2026).ID
wi-oci-pi-045-commercial-liability-guideWhat this source supports (4)
- Errors and Omissions coverage, also known as professional liability, is available for numerous types of professionals, and the coverage protects professional people or organizations from claims arising from failing to render professional services to their clients as expected of a person in their profession.
- A policy written on an occurrence basis covers losses that arise from incidents occurring during the policy term, while a policy written on a claims-made basis covers losses that arise from incidents occurring during the policy term but only if the claim is made during the policy term.
- Product coverage is to protect against losses arising out of the manufacturing, selling, handling, or distribution of a product, and completed operations coverage protects against claims arising out of services performed by a business, such as a building contractor.
- The guide advises commercial buyers to know if their policy is written on an occurrence or claims-made basis.
PDF retrieved and text extracted with pdftotext on 2026-08-31. Every page footer reads PI-045 (R 08/2026), so this is a newer edition than the R 12/2024 printing; publishedDate records the month and year the document itself prints, not a day. The guide's claims-made description is simplified and does not discuss retroactive dates, so it is not relied on for retroactive date mechanics. Published: 2026-08
Active - [7]Insurance Clauses - Professional Liability/Errors and Omissions(opens the original record on Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Risk Management)Oregon Department of Administrative Services, Risk ManagementSecondarySecondaryJurisdiction ORLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Maintained as standing contracting guidance by the state risk management office; no revision date is shown on the page.ID
or-das-professional-liability-clausesWhat this source supports (6)
- The page describes professional liability and errors and omissions coverage as covering liability resulting from errors and omissions or mistakes made in performance of professional services or judgment.
- Most policies cover economic losses, failure to perform, error or omission of product or service, and contract disputes.
- Professional Liability and Errors and Omissions insurance policies are generally issued on a claims made basis, and the page directs staff to require tail coverage for all claims made coverage.
- The model contract clause requires either an extended reporting period of not less than 24 months, or that the contractor maintain tail coverage or continuous claims made liability coverage for a stated minimum period after the contract work is completed or terminated.
- Many times, it is appropriate to require both Professional Liability and Commercial General Liability Coverage, and when a professional liability insurer denies the claim the state may be able to recover the loss under the commercial general liability coverage.
- Coverage is specific to the nature of the profession; for attorneys, the Oregon State Bar Professional Liability Fund provides $300,000 aggregate limits of coverage, and participation in this program is mandatory for all attorneys engaged in private practice whose principal office is in Oregon.
Fetched and read in full on 2026-08-31. Publisher caveat: DAS Risk Management is a state risk-management and contracting office, not an insurance regulator, so this page states government purchasing practice and general descriptions rather than insurance law. authorityLevel is set to secondary for that reason. The Oregon State Bar Professional Liability Fund statement is specific to Oregon attorneys in private practice and says nothing about other professions or other states. Re-verified on 2026-08-31: the page does carry the sentences 'A Professional Liability policy only covers the acts of the insured (professional). This type of policy will never name another person or entity as additional insured.' That absolute was previously repeated in this entry as a rule about the professional liability line. It has been removed from the prose and from this claims array, because a state purchasing office asserting a blanket never is not evidence of what every professional liability form does, no policy form in this entry addresses additional insured status on a professional liability policy, and none was located that would support the general statement. Additional insured treatment on either line is therefore left to the endorsements actually attached to the policy in hand.
Active - [8]The CGL and the Professional Liability Exclusion(opens the original record on International Risk Management Institute (IRMI), expert commentary by Craig Stanovich)International Risk Management Institute (IRMI), expert commentary by Craig StanovichSecondarySecondaryJurisdiction USLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Expert commentary article dated April 1, 2014; no stated update cadence and no visible revision since.ID
irmi-cgl-professional-liability-exclusionWhat this source supports (3)
- The article states that each of the endorsements CG 22 43, CG 22 79 and CG 22 80 is materially different in the scope of the coverage eliminated, and that these endorsements are generally intended to remove coverage from the contractor's CGL policy for engineering, architectural, or surveying services.
- The article states that the endorsement CG 22 43 is no longer intended by ISO to be used with contractors engaged in construction operations.
- The article states that CG 22 80 is aimed at design-build contractors.
Fetched and read on 2026-08-31; the full article is publicly readable. Author Craig Stanovich, dated April 1, 2014. Used only to describe differences among the filed exclusion endorsements; the operative wording of CG 22 43 04 13 and CG 22 79 04 13 was independently verified by extracting and reading those forms. The article does not state an underwriting, pricing, or coverage-intent rationale for why the professional services exclusion exists, so no such rationale is attributed to it. CG 22 80 itself was not retrieved, so every CG 22 80 statement in this entry rests on this single 2014 secondary source and is labeled as such in the prose. Published: 2014-04-01
Active - [9]California Labor Code section 3700(opens the original record on California Legislative Information (Legislative Counsel of California))California Legislative Information (Legislative Counsel of California)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended by the Legislature; check leginfo for the current text each session.ID
lab-3700What this source supports (5)
- The section opens: Every employer except the state shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways.
- One listed method is being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in California.
- Another listed method is securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to self-insure, either as an individual employer or as one employer in a group of employers.
- A further listed method applies to political subdivisions and public entities, which may secure a certificate of consent to self-insure against workers compensation claims.
- The section as displayed carries the amendment note: Amended by Stats. 2002, Ch. 905, Sec. 10. Effective January 1, 2003.
Effective: 2003-01-01
Active - [10]Answers to frequently asked questions about workers' compensation for employers(opens the original record on California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Workers' Compensation)California Department of Industrial Relations, Division of Workers' CompensationRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Updated periodically by DIR; the penalty figures are statutory and can change by amendment, so re-check before each content review.ID
dir-dwc-employer-faqsWhat this source supports (11)
- DIR states that all California employers must provide workers' compensation benefits to their employees under California Labor Code Section 3700.
- DIR states that Section 3700.5 of the California Labor Code makes failing to have workers' compensation coverage a misdemeanor punishable by either a fine of not less than $10,000 or imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year, or both.
- DIR states that the state issues penalties of up to $100,000 against illegally uninsured employers.
- DIR states that a stop order can be issued prohibiting the use of employee labor until coverage is obtained, and that violation of the stop order is itself punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for up to 60 days or a fine of up to $10,000, or both.
- DIR states that additional civil penalties can reach $10,000 per employee where there is a compensable claim, or $2,000 per employee where there is no compensable claim, up to a maximum of $100,000.
- DIR states that State Fund is a state-operated entity that exists in order to transact workers' compensation on a non-profit basis, competes with private workers' compensation insurance companies for business, and also operates as the insurer of last resort if private companies are not willing to offer workers' compensation insurance.
- The page states that all California employers must provide workers' compensation benefits to their employees under California Labor Code Section 3700.
- The page states that executive officers and directors of corporations must be included in workers' compensation coverage, unless the corporation is fully owned by the directors and officers, and that if the directors and officers fully own the corporation then they may elect to be excluded from workers' compensation benefits.
- The page states that Section 3700.5 of the California Labor Code makes it a misdemeanor punishable by either a fine of not less than $10,000 or imprisonment in the county jail for up to one year, or both.
- The page states that a stop order prohibits the use of employee labor until coverage is obtained, and that failure to observe it is a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail for up to 60 days, or by a fine of up to $10,000, or both.
- The page states that penalties of up to $100,000 are issued against illegally uninsured employers, calculated as either twice the amount of unpaid premium or $1,500 per employee, whichever is greater.
Active - [11]ISO form CG 20 10, edition 04 13, Additional Insured - Owners, Lessees Or Contractors - Scheduled Person Or Organization(opens the original record on Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text), posted by the Independent Insurance Agents of Texas)Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text), posted by the Independent Insurance Agents of TexasStandards bodyPrimaryJurisdiction n/aLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: ISO revises commercial general liability endorsement editions periodically; the 12 19 edition is later than this one.ID
iso-cg-20-10-04-13What this source supports (7)
- The form carries the designation CG 20 10 04 13 and the footer 'Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012'.
- The 04 13 edition already contains both Paragraph A provisos found in the 12 19 edition: that the insurance afforded to such additional insured 'only applies to the extent permitted by law', and that where coverage is required by a contract or agreement the insurance 'will not be broader than that which you are required by the contract or agreement to provide for such additional insured.'
- The 04 13 edition contains the same two Paragraph B post-completion exclusions and the same Paragraph C lesser-of cap structure as the 12 19 edition, with a different limits reference: 04 13 reads 'Available under the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations' and 'This endorsement shall not increase the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations.'
- CG 20 10 04 13 states that Section II Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person or organization shown in its Schedule, but only with respect to liability for bodily injury, property damage or personal and advertising injury caused, in whole or in part, by the named insured's acts or omissions or the acts or omissions of those acting on the named insured's behalf, in the performance of the named insured's ongoing operations for the additional insured at the location designated in the Schedule.
- The endorsement states that the insurance afforded to such additional insured only applies to the extent permitted by law, and that if coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the insurance afforded will not be broader than that which the named insured is required by the contract or agreement to provide.
- The endorsement adds exclusions applicable to the additional insured for bodily injury or property damage occurring after all work on the project at the location of the covered operations has been completed, or after that portion of the named insured's work out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project.
- The endorsement adds to Section III Limits Of Insurance that where coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the most the insurer will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance required by the contract or agreement, or the amount available under the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations, whichever is less, and that the endorsement shall not increase the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations.
Downloaded 2026-08-31; the URL returns a PDF, converted with pdftotext -layout and read in full (two pages). Clean, unaltered reproduction. The posting organization is a state agents trade association, not ISO. Cited only to support the edition-to-edition comparison in the variability section; the edition designation gives month and year only, so publishedDate is left unknown. Published: 2013-04
Active - [12]ISO form CG 20 10, edition 12 19, Additional Insured - Owners, Lessees Or Contractors - Scheduled Person Or Organization(opens the original record on Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text), posted by the New York State Office of General Services)Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text), posted by the New York State Office of General ServicesStandards bodyPrimaryJurisdiction n/aLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: ISO revises commercial general liability endorsement editions periodically; a later edition may supersede the 12 19 edition.ID
iso-cg-20-10-12-19What this source supports (6)
- The form carries the designation CG 20 10 12 19, modifies insurance provided under the Commercial General Liability Coverage Part, and carries the footer 'Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018'.
- Paragraph A states that Section II - Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for 'bodily injury', 'property damage' or 'personal and advertising injury' caused, in whole or in part, by your acts or omissions or the acts or omissions of those acting on your behalf, in the performance of your ongoing operations for the additional insured(s) at the location(s) designated above.
- Paragraph A adds two provisos: the insurance afforded to such additional insured 'only applies to the extent permitted by law'; and if coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the insurance afforded 'will not be broader than that which you are required by the contract or agreement to provide for such additional insured.'
- Paragraph B adds exclusions stating that this insurance does not apply to 'bodily injury' or 'property damage' occurring after (1) all work, including materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection with such work, on the project (other than service, maintenance or repairs) to be performed by or on behalf of the additional insured(s) at the location of the covered operations has been completed, or (2) that portion of 'your work' out of which the injury or damage arises has been put to its intended use by any person or organization other than another contractor or subcontractor engaged in performing operations for a principal as a part of the same project.
- Paragraph C provides that where coverage to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the most the insurer will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance required by the contract or agreement, or available under the applicable limits of insurance, whichever is less, and that the endorsement shall not increase the applicable limits of insurance.
- The Schedule has two columns: 'Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organization(s)' and 'Location(s) Of Covered Operations'.
Downloaded 2026-08-31; the URL returns a PDF, converted with pdftotext -layout and read in full (two pages). This is a clean, unaltered reproduction of the ISO form; the posting agency is New York State OGS, not ISO. The edition designation gives month and year (12 19) but no day, so publishedDate is left unknown rather than asserting a day the form does not state. In the extracted text the form's section dash renders as an en dash; it is written here as an ASCII hyphen.
Active - [13]Certificates of Insurance Frequently Asked Questions(opens the original record on Texas Department of Insurance)Texas Department of InsuranceRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction TXLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Revised by TDI as the agency updates its guidance; the page displays its own last-updated date.ID
tdi-certificates-of-insurance-faqWhat this source supports (4)
- TDI answers 'No' to whether a certificate holder can be named as an additional insured on the certificate absent a policy endorsement naming it, adding that the certificate can state that the policy contains a Blanket Additional Insured endorsement.
- TDI states that you should check the 'Additional Insured' box if the policy includes an endorsement that names the certificate holder as an additional insured.
- TDI states that a certificate holder may not use the 'Certificate Holder' box to imply or confer any new or additional rights beyond what the policy or any executed endorsement of insurance provides.
- TDI states that certificates cannot say anything on them that is not the same as what is stated in the insurance policy.
Fetched 2026-08-31. The page displays 'Last updated: 10/31/2022', which is recorded as publishedDate. The four claims correspond to numbered FAQ items 1, 15, 19 and 26. The page does not describe how any particular blanket additional insured form operates or to whom it extends status. Published: 2022-10-31
Active - [14]ISO form CG 20 37, edition 04 13, Additional Insured - Owners, Lessees Or Contractors - Completed Operations(opens the original record on Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text), posted by the Independent Insurance Agents of Texas)Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text), posted by the Independent Insurance Agents of TexasStandards bodyPrimaryJurisdiction n/aLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: ISO revises commercial general liability endorsement editions periodically; the 12 19 edition is later than this one.ID
iso-cg-20-37-04-13What this source supports (6)
- The form carries the designation CG 20 37 04 13 and the footer 'Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012'.
- The 04 13 edition already contains both Paragraph A provisos found in the 12 19 edition: that the insurance afforded to such additional insured 'only applies to the extent permitted by law', and that where coverage is required by a contract or agreement the insurance 'will not be broader than that which you are required by the contract or agreement to provide for such additional insured.'
- The 04 13 edition contains the same Paragraph B lesser-of cap structure as the 12 19 edition, with a different limits reference: 04 13 reads 'Available under the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations' and 'This endorsement shall not increase the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations.'
- CG 20 37 04 13 states that Section II Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person or organization shown in its Schedule, but only with respect to liability for bodily injury or property damage caused, in whole or in part, by the named insured's work at the location designated and described in the Schedule of the endorsement and included in the products-completed operations hazard.
- The endorsement states that the insurance afforded to such additional insured only applies to the extent permitted by law, and that if coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the insurance afforded will not be broader than that which the named insured is required by the contract or agreement to provide.
- The endorsement adds to Section III Limits Of Insurance that where coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the most the insurer will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance required by the contract or agreement, or the amount available under the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations, whichever is less, and that the endorsement shall not increase the applicable Limits of Insurance shown in the Declarations.
Downloaded 2026-08-31; the URL returns a one-page PDF, converted with pdftotext -layout and read in full. Clean, unaltered reproduction. The posting organization is a state agents trade association, not ISO. Cited only to support the edition-to-edition comparison in the variability section. Published: 2013-04
Active - [15]ISO form CG 20 37, edition 12 19, Additional Insured - Owners, Lessees Or Contractors - Completed Operations(opens the original record on Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text), posted by the New York State Office of General Services)Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text), posted by the New York State Office of General ServicesStandards bodyPrimaryJurisdiction n/aLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: ISO revises commercial general liability endorsement editions periodically; a later edition may supersede the 12 19 edition.ID
iso-cg-20-37-12-19What this source supports (5)
- The form carries the designation CG 20 37 12 19, is titled 'Additional Insured - Owners, Lessees Or Contractors - Completed Operations', modifies insurance provided under both the Commercial General Liability Coverage Part and the Products/Completed Operations Liability Coverage Part, and carries the footer 'Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2018'.
- Paragraph A states that Section II - Who Is An Insured is amended to include as an additional insured the person(s) or organization(s) shown in the Schedule, but only with respect to liability for 'bodily injury' or 'property damage' caused, in whole or in part, by 'your work' at the location designated and described in the Schedule of the endorsement performed for that additional insured and included in the 'products-completed operations hazard'.
- Paragraph A adds two provisos: the insurance afforded to such additional insured 'only applies to the extent permitted by law'; and if coverage provided to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the insurance afforded 'will not be broader than that which you are required by the contract or agreement to provide for such additional insured.'
- Paragraph B provides that where coverage to the additional insured is required by a contract or agreement, the most the insurer will pay on behalf of the additional insured is the amount of insurance required by the contract or agreement, or available under the applicable limits of insurance, whichever is less, and that the endorsement shall not increase the applicable limits of insurance.
- The Schedule has two columns: 'Name Of Additional Insured Person(s) Or Organization(s)' and 'Location And Description Of Completed Operations'.
Downloaded 2026-08-31; the URL returns a one-page PDF, converted with pdftotext -layout and read in full. Clean, unaltered reproduction; posted by New York State OGS, not by ISO. The edition designation gives month and year only, so publishedDate is left unknown. A prior draft listed a claim that the two grants are distinct; that is an inference drawn by comparing this form with CG 20 10 and is not text printed on either form, so it has been removed from this source's claims.
Active - [16]Acceptable Waiver Of Subrogation Endorsements (municipal sample packet reproducing CG 24 04 05 09 and WC 04 03 06)(opens the original record on City of Sierra Madre, California)City of Sierra Madre, CaliforniaSecondarySecondaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: The city may revise its sample packet at any time; the underlying forms are revised by their own filers.ID
sierra-madre-waiver-of-subrogation-sample-packetWhat this source supports (3)
- The packet reproduces ISO form CG 24 04 05 09, 'Waiver Of Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us', which adds the following to Paragraph 8, Transfer Of Rights Of Recovery Against Others To Us, of Section IV - Conditions: 'We waive any right of recovery we may have against the person or organization shown in the Schedule above because of payments we make for injury or damage arising out of your ongoing operations or "your work" done under a contract with that person or organization and included in the "products-completed operations hazard". This waiver applies only to the person or organization shown in the Schedule above.' The reproduced form carries the footer 'Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2008'.
- The packet reproduces form WC 04 03 06 (Ed. 04/84), 'Waiver Of Our Right To Recover From Others Endorsement - California', which carries the same waiver sentence as WC 00 03 13 and adds: 'You must maintain payroll records accurately segregating the remuneration of your employees while engaged in the work described in the Schedule' and 'The additional premium for this endorsement shall be _____% of the California workers compensation premium otherwise due on such remuneration.' The percentage is a blank field on the form; no figure is stated.
- The packet presents waiver of subrogation endorsements under their own heading, separate from additional insured endorsements, and describes CG 24 04 as providing 'a specific waiver of subrogation for the designated person or organization, barring suit by the company which assumes the insured's rights after loss payment.'
Downloaded 2026-08-31; converted with pdftotext -layout and read. This is a municipal sample packet, not a standards-body publication: every reproduced form is overprinted with the word SAMPLE and has 'City of Sierra Madre' inserted into the Schedule, and the overprint leaves visible artifacts in the extracted text. authorityLevel is therefore 'secondary' and primary is false. It is cited here only for the text of CG 24 04 05 09 and WC 04 03 06, for which no cleaner accessible copy was located on 2026-08-31; WC 00 03 13 is cited instead to a clean rating bureau copy. A cleaner filing-repository or regulator posting for these two forms would be a worthwhile replacement.
Active - [17]Insurance requirements(opens the original record on Public Health - Seattle & King County)Public Health - Seattle & King CountySecondarySecondaryJurisdiction WALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Standing contract requirements page; no revision date is shown on the page.ID
kingcounty-insurance-requirementsWhat this source supports (4)
- The page requires commercial general liability insurance of $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 in the aggregate for bodily injury, personal and advertising injury and property damage, with coverage at least as broad as that afforded under ISO form number CG 00 01 current edition or its substantive equivalent.
- In the event that services delivered pursuant to the contract either directly or indirectly involve or require professional services, Professional Liability, Errors, and Omissions coverage shall be provided, at $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate.
- Each insurance policy shall be written on an occurrence basis or form, except that insurance on a claims made basis or form may be acceptable with prior County approval.
- If coverage is approved and purchased on a claims made basis or form, the contractor warrants continuation of coverage, either through policy renewals or the purchase of an extended discovery period, if such extended coverage is available, for not less than three years from the date of contract termination and/or conversion from a claims made form to an occurrence coverage form.
Fetched and read in full on 2026-08-31. Publisher caveat: this is a county contracting authority, not an insurance regulator, and these requirements apply only to its own contracts, so authorityLevel is set to secondary. Used to show that a real public contract can require both coverages and treats the occurrence versus claims made distinction as material. The page itself uses an en dash in its name; the ASCII hyphen is used here.
Active - [18]ISO form CG 20 01, edition 04 13, Primary And Noncontributory - Other Insurance Condition(opens the original record on Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text), posted by the Independent Insurance Agents of Texas)Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text), posted by the Independent Insurance Agents of TexasStandards bodyPrimaryJurisdiction n/aLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: ISO revises commercial general liability endorsement editions periodically; a later edition may supersede the 04 13 edition.ID
iso-cg-20-01-04-13What this source supports (6)
- The form carries the designation CG 20 01 04 13, is titled 'Primary And Noncontributory - Other Insurance Condition', modifies insurance provided under the Commercial General Liability Coverage Part and the Products/Completed Operations Liability Coverage Part, and carries the footer 'Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012'.
- The form states that the following is added to the Other Insurance Condition 'and supersedes any provision to the contrary'.
- The added language reads: 'This insurance is primary to and will not seek contribution from any other insurance available to an additional insured under your policy provided that: (1) The additional insured is a Named Insured under such other insurance; and (2) You have agreed in writing in a contract or agreement that this insurance would be primary and would not seek contribution from any other insurance available to the additional insured.'
- CG 20 01 04 13 is a separate endorsement from the additional insured endorsements CG 20 10 and CG 20 37.
- CG 20 01 04 13 is titled Primary And Noncontributory - Other Insurance Condition and modifies the Commercial General Liability Coverage Part and the Products/Completed Operations Liability Coverage Part.
- The endorsement adds to the Other Insurance Condition, and supersedes any provision to the contrary, that this insurance is primary to and will not seek contribution from any other insurance available to an additional insured under the policy, provided that the additional insured is a Named Insured under such other insurance and the named insured has agreed in writing in a contract or agreement that this insurance would be primary and would not seek contribution from any other insurance available to the additional insured.
Downloaded 2026-08-31; the URL returns a one-page PDF, converted with pdftotext -layout and read in full. Clean, unaltered reproduction of the ISO form; the posting organization is a state agents trade association, not ISO. This replaces an earlier draft citation to a City of Hayward sample copy of the same form, which was a municipal sample rather than a clean form reproduction and which had been used to support a generalization about California public agencies that a single city sample cannot carry. Published: 2013-04
Active - [19]Approved Certificates of Insurance(opens the original record on New York State Department of Financial Services)New York State Department of Financial ServicesRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction NYLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: DFS adds form editions as ACORD publishes them and DFS approves them.ID
nydfs-approved-certificatesWhat this source supports (6)
- The form titled Certificate of Liability Insurance is ACORD 25.
- The form titled Certificate of Property Insurance is ACORD 24.
- The form titled Evidence of Property Insurance is ACORD 27.
- The form titled Evidence of Commercial Property Insurance is ACORD 28.
- The form titled Evidence of Flood Insurance is ACORD 29.
- Each of these forms appears on the New York Department of Financial Services list of approved certificates of insurance, with multiple approved editions listed for several of them.
Fetched on 2026-08-31 and confirmed the form numbers and titles against the page's table. The page notes that ACORD certificate content is copyrighted, so no form wording is reproduced. This page establishes form numbers and titles and the fact of New York approval; it does not state what any lender requires.
Active - [20]Minnesota Statutes Section 60A.39 (Certificates of Insurance)(opens the original record on Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes)Minnesota Office of the Revisor of StatutesPrimary lawPrimaryJurisdiction MNLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended by legislation; re-check the revisor page before each publication cycle.ID
mn-stat-60a-39What this source supports (3)
- Minnesota Statutes Section 60A.39, subdivision 1, provides that a certificate of insurance is a document that provides evidence of property or liability insurance coverage and the amount of insurance issued, and does not convey any contractual rights to the certificate holder.
- Subdivision 2 bars an insurer or licensed producer from issuing a certificate of insurance or other document that affirmatively or negatively amends, extends, or alters the coverage provided by an approved policy, form, or endorsement without the written approval of the commissioner.
- Subdivision 3 requires a certificate or memorandum of insurance issued to a party other than the policyholder to contain the statement that the certificate or memorandum of insurance does not affirmatively or negatively amend, extend, or alter the coverage afforded by the insurance policy.
Active - [21]Certificates of insurance (contractor licensing guidance)(opens the original record on Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry)Minnesota Department of Labor and IndustryRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction MNLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Agency web page; re-check annually.ID
mn-dli-certificates-of-insuranceWhat this source supports (3)
- The Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry states that the ACORD 25 certificate of liability insurance form, or a similar form filed with the Minnesota Department of Commerce, can be used to provide evidence of general liability insurance coverage.
- The department states that the form can also be used to report workers' compensation insurance coverage.
- The department requires a certificate to be submitted with an application form, a renewal form, or when updating general liability insurance coverage.
Active - [22]Coverage Insights: What Are Loss Runs?(opens the original record on Hylant Group, Inc. (insurance brokerage))Hylant Group, Inc. (insurance brokerage)SecondarySecondaryJurisdiction USLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Blog post; not revised on a published schedule.ID
hylant-loss-runsWhat this source supports (1)
- Hylant, an insurance brokerage, writes that underwriters will often require organizations to submit loss runs for the past three to five years.
Fetched today and the three to five years sentence confirmed verbatim. This is a broker's description of common market practice, not a legal or filed requirement, and the prose says so in those words. It is one of only two sources in this bundle that speak to what underwriters commonly request, and both are secondary voices, which is why the entry's confidence is contextual rather than established. Published: 2023-07-12
Active - [23]OGC Opinion No. 03-07-35: Claims Made and Reported Policies(opens the original record on New York State Department of Financial Services, Office of General Counsel (issued by the then New York State Insurance Department))New York State Department of Financial Services, Office of General Counsel (issued by the then New York State Insurance Department)RegulatorSecondaryJurisdiction NYLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: one-time opinion letter; the Department does not routinely revisit or annotate archived OGC opinionsID
ny-dfs-ogc-03-07-35What this source supports (3)
- States that a claims-made and reported policy requires that the claim and the reporting of the claim to the insurer both take place during the same policy term.
- States that authorized insurers are not permitted to write such policies chiefly because of the risk of gaps in coverage inherent in such policies.
- Concludes that a claims-made and reported policy may not be issued in New York except by an unauthorized insurer through an excess line broker.
Fetched twice on 2026-08-31; opinion number, July 31, 2003 date, and the quoted language confirmed on the page. This is an informal Office of General Counsel opinion letter, not a regulation, and it is 23 years old. The page carries no currency or supersession disclaimer, which means its continued accuracy is not affirmed by the page itself. Cited in this bundle as a 2003 regulator opinion, not as a standing legal rule. Published: 2003-07-31
Active - [24]Prior acts coverage (glossary of insurance and risk management terms)(opens the original record on International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI))International Risk Management Institute, Inc. (IRMI)SecondarySecondaryJurisdiction USLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: glossary entries are revised by the publisher without a fixed scheduleID
irmi-prior-acts-coverageWhat this source supports (1)
- Defines prior acts coverage as a feature of claims-made policies that have either no retroactive date or a retroactive date earlier than the inception date of the policy.
Fetched 2026-08-31; the definition was read off the page. IRMI is a commercial insurance reference publisher, not a regulator, so this is cited only to attribute an industry term of art and never for a legal requirement or a coverage outcome. The page shows no publication or revision date.
Active - [25]Exclusion - Designated Professional Services, endorsement CG 21 16 04 13 (ISO)(opens the original record on Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text); posted by the Independent Insurance Agents of Texas InfoCentral)Insurance Services Office, Inc. (form text); posted by the Independent Insurance Agents of Texas InfoCentralStandards bodyPrimaryJurisdiction USLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: ISO revises endorsements periodically; other professional services exclusion endorsements with different scope also exist.ID
iso-cg-21-16-04-13What this source supports (3)
- Endorsement CG 21 16 04 13 adds an exclusion to Coverage A and Coverage B of the Commercial General Liability Coverage Part stating that the insurance does not apply to bodily injury, property damage, or personal and advertising injury due to the rendering of or failure to render any professional service.
- The exclusion applies only with respect to the professional services shown in the endorsement's Schedule, which is completed for the individual policy.
- The endorsement states that the exclusion applies even if the claims against any insured allege negligence or other wrongdoing in the supervision, hiring, employment, training or monitoring of others by that insured, if the occurrence or offense which caused the bodily injury or property damage, or the offense which caused the personal and advertising injury, involved the rendering of or failure to render any professional service.
Published: 2013-04
Active - [26]Exclusion - Contractors - Professional Liability, Form CG 22 79 04 13(opens the original record on Insurance Services Office, Inc. (specimen published publicly by the New York State Office of General Services))Insurance Services Office, Inc. (specimen published publicly by the New York State Office of General Services)Standards bodyPrimaryJurisdiction USLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Advisory endorsement revised on multi-year cycles; the 04 13 edition is the one reviewed.ID
iso-cg-22-79-04-13What this source supports (3)
- The endorsement excludes bodily injury, property damage or personal and advertising injury arising out of the rendering of or failure to render any professional services by you or on your behalf, but only with respect to providing engineering, architectural or surveying services to others in your capacity as an engineer, architect or surveyor, and providing, or hiring independent professionals to provide, engineering, architectural or surveying services in connection with construction work you perform.
- Paragraph 3 states that professional services do not include services within construction means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures employed by you in connection with your operations in your capacity as a construction contractor.
- The exclusion applies even if the claims against any insured allege negligence or other wrongdoing in the supervision, hiring, employment, training or monitoring of others by that insured, if the occurrence or offense involved the rendering of or failure to render any professional services by you or on your behalf with respect to the operations described in the endorsement.
PDF retrieved on 2026-08-31 and the complete one-page endorsement extracted with pdftotext and read in full. Header reads COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CG 22 79 04 13, footer reads CG 22 79 04 13, Insurance Services Office, Inc., 2012, Page 1 of 1. The form prints only the edition designation 04 13, so publishedDate and effectiveDate record month and year, not a day. Any comparison of this endorsement's breadth against CG 22 43 is an inference and is not text on the form, so comparative statements are attributed to the secondary commentary instead. Published: 2013-04 Effective: 2013-04
Active - [27]Workers' Compensation Requirements(opens the original record on California Contractors State License Board)California Contractors State License BoardRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Agency web page; re-check at least annually and around CSLB rule changes.ID
cslb-workers-comp-requirementsWhat this source supports (5)
- CSLB requires licensees with an active license, licensees reactivating an inactive license, and applicants for an active contractor license to provide a valid Certificate of Workers' Compensation Insurance or a valid Certification of Self-Insurance from the Department of Industrial Relations, or to file a signed exemption certifying they have no employees.
- CSLB states that all active C-8 Concrete, C-20 Warm-Air Heating, Ventilating and Air-Conditioning, C-22 Asbestos Abatement, C-39 Roofing, and C-61/D-49 Tree Service contractors are required to carry workers compensation insurance or hold a valid Certification of Self-Insurance whether or not they have employees.
- CSLB requires the workers compensation certificate to list CSLB as the certificate holder, the contractor's business name and license or application fee number, the policy number, the policy effective and expiration dates, and the signature of an authorized representative.
- CSLB states an exemption cannot be filed by a licensee who employs anyone subject to California workers compensation law, who has a Responsible Managing Employee, or who holds one of the classifications requiring mandatory coverage.
- CSLB states that when an exempt licensee hires an employee, proof of workers compensation coverage must be received at CSLB headquarters within 90 days of the hire, and that failure to do so results in license suspension.
Active - [28]California Labor Code section 3352(opens the original record on California Legislative Information (Legislative Counsel of California))California Legislative Information (Legislative Counsel of California)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended by the Legislature; check leginfo for the current text each session.ID
lab-3352What this source supports (6)
- The section excludes from the definition of employee an officer or member of the board of directors of a quasi-public or private corporation who owns at least 10 percent of the issued and outstanding stock, or at least 1 percent if that officer's or member's parent, grandparent, sibling, spouse, or child owns at least 10 percent, who is covered by a health insurance policy or health care service plan, and who executes a written waiver of rights under the chapter stating under penalty of perjury that the person is a qualifying officer or director.
- The waiver is effective upon the date of receipt and acceptance by the corporation's insurance carrier, and the carrier may elect to backdate the acceptance of the waiver up to 15 days prior to the date of receipt.
- The section provides a conclusive presumption that a person who executes a waiver under that subdivision is not covered by workers compensation benefits.
- An officer or director of a private corporation who is the sole shareholder of that corporation is excluded from the definition of employee unless the officer, director, or corporation has elected to be subject to liability for workers compensation under subdivision (a) of Section 4151.
- The section contains many other exclusions from the definition of employee with their own conditions, including certain persons employed by a parent, spouse, or child, certain persons employed for limited hours or limited earnings, certain volunteers, general partners and managing members, owners of professional corporations, and officers and directors of cooperative corporations.
- The section as displayed carries the note: Repealed (in Sec. 3) and added by Stats. 2017, Ch. 770, Sec. 4. (SB 189) Effective January 1, 2018. Section operative July 1, 2018, by its own provisions.
Effective: 2018-07-01
Active - [29]Standard Classification System - Online Guide to Workers' Compensation(opens the original record on Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB))Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB)Standards bodyPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Page carries schema.org datePublished 2012-12-10 and dateModified 2026-06-03; advisory pure premium rates are amended at least annually.ID
wcirb-standard-classification-systemWhat this source supports (8)
- For insurer data reporting purposes, California businesses are classified using the Standard Classification System found in Part 3 of the California Workers' Compensation Uniform Statistical Reporting Plan-1995.
- The Uniform Statistical Reporting Plan is part of the California Code of Regulations and is approved by the Insurance Commissioner.
- The Standard Classification System contains approximately 700 industry classifications and describes groups of employers whose businesses are relatively similar.
- An insurer may deviate from the Standard Classification System for underwriting purposes; however, for data reporting purposes, all insurers must use the standard classification system found in the Uniform Statistical Reporting Plan.
- An advisory pure premium rate, expressed as a rate per $100 in payroll, is calculated by the WCIRB for each classification.
- For most industries, classifications are assigned by analyzing an employer's overall California operations and identifying one classification that describes the business as a whole.
- Most employers are assigned to only one classification.
- Some industries have their own special classification procedures.
Re-fetched and re-verified 2026-08-31. WebFetch is blocked by the site WAF (HTTP 403); fetched over HTTPS with a standard browser user agent, HTTP 200, 114,801 bytes, and read the rendered body text. Every claim above was matched as a literal string in the fetched page. An earlier draft carried a ninth claim asserting that California uses its own system 'rather than NCCI's classification manual'; a byte-level grep of the fetched page returns ZERO occurrences of 'NCCI' or 'National Council', so that claim stays deleted and this source is not cited for any NCCI proposition. The page's example rate table is labeled September 1, 2024, so no specific dollar rate is cited from it. publishedDate is the schema.org datePublished, not dateModified. URL RE-CHECKED 2026-08-31: HTTP 200, no redirect, 114,913 bytes; schema.org datePublished 2012-12-10 and dateModified 2026-06-03 both re-read on the page today. A fresh case-insensitive grep for NCCI or National Council again returns ZERO hits. Published: 2012-12-10
Active - [30]Classification Assignments - Online Guide to Workers' Compensation(opens the original record on Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB))Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB)Standards bodyPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Maintained alongside annual amendments to the Uniform Statistical Reporting Plan.ID
wcirb-classification-assignmentsWhat this source supports (4)
- The general rules and basic procedures for classifying a business are contained in Part 3 of the California Workers' Compensation Uniform Statistical Reporting Plan-1995, which is part of the California Code of Regulations and is approved by the Insurance Commissioner.
- Any business specifically described by a classification must be assigned to that classification; any business not specifically described by a classification must be assigned to the most analogous (most similar) classification.
- Classifications assigned to a business are used by its insurer to submit payroll and loss data to the WCIRB, and the WCIRB in turn uses this data by classification for experience rating purposes and the development of pure premium rates.
- The page lists seven general procedures used in assigning classifications: Assignment by Analogy, Standard Exceptions, Single Enterprise, Multiple Enterprises, Miscellaneous Employees, General Inclusions and General Exclusions, and Special Industries.
Re-fetched and re-verified 2026-08-31 over HTTPS with a browser user agent (WebFetch gets 403), HTTP 200, 87,174 bytes. All four claims matched as literal strings, including the seven-item procedure list rendered as 'Assignment by AnalogyStandard ExceptionsSingle EnterpriseMultiple EnterprisesMiscellaneous EmployeesGeneral Inclusions and General ExclusionsSpecial Industries'. The Part 3 / California Code of Regulations claim was added on this pass because it is on the page and the prose relies on it. A byte-level grep of the fetched page returns ZERO occurrences of 'NCCI' or 'National Council'. URL RE-CHECKED 2026-08-31: HTTP 200, no redirect, 87,290 bytes. All four claims re-matched today, including the full seven-item procedure list. A fresh grep for NCCI or National Council again returns ZERO hits.
Active - [31]California Civil Code Section 2782 - void indemnity provisions in construction contracts(opens the original record on California Legislative Information (California Legislature))California Legislative Information (California Legislature)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended only by the California Legislature; recheck leginfo for current text.ID
ca-civ-2782What this source supports (6)
- Section 2782(a) makes void and unenforceable construction contract provisions that purport to indemnify the promisee against liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or any other loss, damage or expense arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the promisee or the promisee's agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to the promisee, or for defects in design furnished by those persons.
- Section 2782(a) further provides that the section shall not affect the validity of any insurance contract, workers' compensation, or agreement issued by an admitted insurer as defined by the Insurance Code.
- Section 2782(b)(1) voids provisions in construction contracts with a public agency entered into before January 1, 2013 that purport to impose on the contractor, or relieve the public agency from, liability for the active negligence of the public agency.
- Section 2782(b)(2) voids provisions in construction contracts with a public agency entered into on or after January 1, 2013 that purport to impose on any contractor, subcontractor, or supplier of goods or services, or relieve the public agency from, liability for the active negligence of the public agency.
- Section 2782(c)(1) makes provisions in construction contracts entered into on or after January 1, 2013 with the owner of privately owned real property to be improved, and as to which the owner is not acting as a contractor or supplier of materials or equipment to the work, unenforceable to the extent of the active negligence of the owner, including that of its employees.
- The section page shows the history line: Amended by Stats. 2011, Ch. 707, Sec. 2. (SB 474) Effective January 1, 2012.
Fetched 2026-08-31 from the official leginfo section page; subdivisions (a), (b)(1), (b)(2) and (c)(1) read verbatim, including the admitted-insurer savings clause and the (c)(1) carve-out for an owner not acting as a contractor or supplier of materials or equipment. effectiveDate is the effective date of the last amendment shown on the page (January 1, 2012); January 1, 2013 is a contract-date dividing line inside subdivisions (b) and (c), not the effective date of the section. No subdivision of section 2782 uses the term 'additional insured'. Effective: 2012-01-01
Active - [32]California Civil Code Section 2782 (indemnity provisions in construction contracts)(opens the original record on California Legislative Information, Office of Legislative Counsel)California Legislative Information, Office of Legislative CounselPrimary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended by legislation; re-check leginfo for the current version before each publication cycle.ID
ca-civ-code-2782What this source supports (9)
- Section 2782(a) provides that, except as provided in Sections 2782.1, 2782.2, 2782.5, and 2782.6, provisions, clauses, covenants, or agreements contained in, collateral to, or affecting any construction contract that purport to indemnify the promisee against liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or any other loss, damage or expense arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the promisee or the promisee's agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to the promisee, or for defects in design furnished by those persons, are against public policy and are void and unenforceable.
- Subdivision (a) closes with a proviso that the section shall not affect the validity of any insurance contract, workers' compensation, or agreement issued by an admitted insurer as defined by the Insurance Code.
- Section 2782(b)(1) provides that, except as provided in Sections 2782.1, 2782.2, and 2782.5, provisions, clauses, covenants, or agreements contained in, collateral to, or affecting any construction contract with a public agency entered into before January 1, 2013, that purport to impose on the contractor, or relieve the public agency from, liability for the active negligence of the public agency are void and unenforceable.
- Section 2782(b)(2) states the same rule for any construction contract with a public agency entered into on or after January 1, 2013, and reaches provisions that purport to impose that liability on any contractor, subcontractor, or supplier of goods or services, or to relieve the public agency from it.
- Section 2782(c)(1) provides that, except as provided in subdivision (d) and Sections 2782.1, 2782.2, and 2782.5, provisions, clauses, covenants, or agreements contained in, collateral to, or affecting any construction contract entered into on or after January 1, 2013, with the owner of privately owned real property to be improved and as to which the owner is not acting as a contractor or supplier of materials or equipment to the work, that purport to impose on any contractor, subcontractor, or supplier of goods or services, or relieve the owner from, liability are unenforceable to the extent of the active negligence of the owner, including that of its employees.
- Section 2782(c)(2) provides that for purposes of that subdivision an owner of privately owned real property to be improved includes the owner of any interest therein, other than a mortgage or other interest that is held solely as security for performance of an obligation.
- Section 2782(c)(3) provides that the subdivision shall not apply to a homeowner performing a home improvement project on his or her own single family dwelling.
- The section continues through subdivisions (d) to (i), which address indemnity for residential construction defect claims subject to Title 7, the defense and reimbursement procedure between subcontractors and builders or general contractors, remedies for nonperformance, preservation of equitable indemnity rights, claims against material suppliers and design professionals, and the definition of construction defect. Nothing in this cluster is drawn from those subdivisions.
- The page carries the note 'Amended by Stats. 2011, Ch. 707, Sec. 2. (SB 474) Effective January 1, 2012.'
Effective: 2012-01-01
Active - [33]California Civil Code Section 2782.05 - limits on subcontractor insure-or-indemnify clauses, with an additional insurance endorsement exception(opens the original record on California Legislative Information (California Legislature))California Legislative Information (California Legislature)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended only by the California Legislature; recheck leginfo for current text.ID
ca-civ-2782-05What this source supports (8)
- Section 2782.05(a) applies, except as provided in subdivision (b), to construction contracts and amendments entered into on or after January 1, 2013.
- Section 2782.05(a) makes provisions that purport to insure or indemnify, including the cost to defend, a general contractor, construction manager, or other subcontractor, by a subcontractor, against liability for claims of death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or any other loss, damage, or expense void and unenforceable to the extent the claims arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the active negligence or willful misconduct of that general contractor, construction manager, or other subcontractor, or their other agents, other servants, or other independent contractors who are responsible to them, or for defects in design furnished by those persons, or to the extent the claims do not arise out of the scope of work of the subcontractor pursuant to the construction contract. The voiding operates to the extent stated, not as an automatic voiding of the entire clause.
- Section 2782.05(b)(1) excepts contracts for residential construction subject to any part of Title 7 (commencing with Section 895) of Part 2 of Division 2.
- Section 2782.05(b)(2) excepts direct contracts with a public agency governed by subdivision (b) of Section 2782, and (b)(3) excepts direct contracts with the owner of privately owned real property to be improved that are governed by subdivision (c) of Section 2782.
- Section 2782.05(b)(4) excepts any wrap-up insurance policy or program, and (b)(5) excepts a cause of action for breach of contract or warranty that exists independently of an indemnity obligation.
- Section 2782.05(b)(6) excepts a provision in a construction contract that requires the promisor to purchase or maintain insurance covering the acts or omissions of the promisor, including additional insurance endorsements covering the acts or omissions of the promisor during ongoing and completed operations.
- Section 2782.05(c) provides that, notwithstanding any choice-of-law rules that would apply the laws of another jurisdiction, the law of California shall apply to every contract to which the section applies.
- The section page shows the history line: Added by Stats. 2011, Ch. 707, Sec. 3. (SB 474) Effective January 1, 2012.
Fetched 2026-08-31 from the official leginfo section page in two passes: the opening and the closing of subdivision (a) were read verbatim, including the 'to the extent' limiter and the scope-of-work prong, and the full (b)(1) through (b)(6) list and subdivision (c) were read verbatim. effectiveDate is the effective date shown on the page for the section as added; January 1, 2013 is the contract-date trigger inside subdivision (a). Effective: 2012-01-01
Active - [34]California Civil Code Section 2782.05 (subcontractor indemnity and defense of a general contractor)(opens the original record on California Legislative Information, Office of Legislative Counsel)California Legislative Information, Office of Legislative CounselPrimary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended by legislation; re-check leginfo before each publication cycle.ID
ca-civ-code-2782-05What this source supports (8)
- Section 2782.05(a) reaches provisions, clauses, covenants, and agreements contained in, collateral to, or affecting any construction contract and amendments thereto entered into on or after January 1, 2013. By its own words the section does not reach a construction contract entered into before that date, and it does not reach contracts that are not construction contracts.
- Within that scope, and except as provided in subdivision (b), Section 2782.05(a) makes void and unenforceable provisions that purport to insure or indemnify, including the cost to defend, a general contractor, construction manager, or other subcontractor, by a subcontractor, against liability for claims of death or bodily injury to persons, injury to property, or any other loss, damage, or expense, to the extent the claims arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the active negligence or willful misconduct of that general contractor, construction manager, or other subcontractor.
- Subdivision (b) contains thirteen numbered paragraphs listing categories the section does not affect. The ones verified word for word on the page and relied on in this cluster are (b)(1) contracts for residential construction subject to any part of Title 7, (b)(2) direct contracts with a public agency governed by Section 2782(b), (b)(3) direct contracts with the owner of privately owned real property governed by Section 2782(c), (b)(4) any wrap-up insurance policy or program, (b)(5) a cause of action for breach of contract or warranty that exists independently of an indemnity obligation, (b)(7) indemnity provisions contained in loan and financing documents, (b)(8) general agreements of indemnity required by sureties as a condition of execution of bonds, (b)(9) the benefits and protections provided by the workers' compensation laws, (b)(10) the benefits or protections provided by the governmental immunity laws, and (b)(12) contracts with design professionals.
- Subdivision (b) also contains (b)(11), which opens 'Provisions that require the purchase of any of the following:' and then lists specified insurance beginning with owners and contractors protective coverage, and (b)(13), which opens 'Any agreement between a promisor and an admitted surety insurer regarding the promisor's obligations'. Neither was captured in full on the fetched page, so neither is recited in this cluster and the list above should be read as partial.
- Subdivision (b)(6) preserves a provision in such a construction contract that requires the promisor to purchase or maintain insurance covering the acts or omissions of the promisor, including additional insured endorsements covering the acts or omissions of the promisor during ongoing and completed operations.
- Subdivision (c) opens 'Notwithstanding any choice-of-law rules that would apply the laws of another jurisdiction, the law of' and applies California law to a contract within the section's scope.
- Subdivision (d) provides that any waiver of the provisions of the section is contrary to public policy and is void and unenforceable.
- The page carries the note 'Added by Stats. 2011, Ch. 707, Sec. 3. (SB 474) Effective January 1, 2012.'
Effective: 2012-01-01
Active - [35]Answers to 32 Questions Public and Private Owners Ask About Contract Bonding(opens the original record on National Association of Surety Bond Producers (NASBP), SuretyLearn.org)National Association of Surety Bond Producers (NASBP), SuretyLearn.orgSecondarySecondaryJurisdiction USLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Periodically revised by NASBP; the fetched file is dated 8-18 in its filenameID
nasbp-32-questions-contract-bondingWhat this source supports (15)
- A surety bond is a promise to be liable for the debt, default, or failure of another, and is a three-party contract by which one party, the surety, guarantees the performance of a second party, the principal, to a third party, the obligee.
- The surety is an insurance company licensed by a state department of insurance to provide surety bonds to guarantee the performance of a principal.
- The obligee is the entity with whom the principal has a contract and to whom the bond is given; in construction this is the project owner or the prime contractor.
- If the owner is the bond obligee, then the prime contractor is the principal; if the prime contractor is the obligee, then the subcontractor is the principal.
- Surety bonds are almost always written by insurance companies that are licensed by state insurance departments, but they are not like traditional insurance policies: surety bonds are three-party agreements and traditional insurance policies, such as life insurance or property insurance policies, are two-party agreements.
- The surety does not assume the primary obligation but is secondarily liable if the principal defaults on its bonded obligation.
- A surety does not expect to suffer losses because the surety expects the bonded principal to perform its contractual obligations and because the surety has a signed indemnity agreement from the contractor to protect the surety from any losses the surety suffers as a result of having issued bonds.
- A general agreement of indemnity is a contract between a surety company and a contractor that obligates the contractor and other indemnitors to protect the surety company from any loss or expense that the surety has as a result of having issued bonds on behalf of the bond principal, and if the contractor fails to fulfill its bonded obligation and the surety suffers any loss, the indemnitors are legally bound to indemnify, or pay back, the surety for its losses.
- A fundamental concept of suretyship is that the surety will not sustain a loss; the surety expects to be indemnified and reimbursed for any payments or losses by the principal and indemnitors under the indemnity agreement, so the general agreement of indemnity is needed before the surety issues any bonds and applies to all bonds issued by the surety for the principal.
- A surety company that issues bonds on behalf of a contractor almost always requires that the principal, the individuals who own or control the company, their spouses, and often affiliated companies sign the general agreement of indemnity.
- Obtaining bonds is more like obtaining bank credit than purchasing insurance, and almost all sureties consider financial capacity, net worth, cash flow, assets, credit score, work in progress, work history including expertise and experience, banking relationship, nature of the project to be bonded, and character of the contractor.
- The main types of contract surety bonds are bid bonds, performance bonds, payment bonds, and warranty bonds, sometimes called maintenance bonds.
- Under a bid bond, the surety's liability is generally limited to the face amount, or penal sum, of the bond, which is typically in the range of 5 to 20 percent of the contract bid price.
- The cost of a bond is based on rates filed by insurance companies with the state insurance department and is based on the contract amount; it can vary from less than 0.5 percent to as much as 3 percent of the contract price, and for a small and emerging contractor with minimal experience a contractor can expect to pay 2 to 3 percent of the contract price.
- Bonds must be paid when they are executed, and bonds are non-cancelable.
Downloaded 2026-08-31 and extracted with pdftotext, then read the relevant question and answer blocks directly. This is a trade association publication and is labeled secondary. It is used for the three-party structure, the credit-versus-insurance contrast, the general agreement of indemnity, bid bond penal sums, and pricing practice. Statutory and regulatory points rest on primary sources instead. The document's penal sum statements are specific to bid bonds and to dual obligee savings clauses; no general penal sum rule is claimed from it here.
Active - [36]FAR 28.102-1 - Performance and payment bonds and alternative payment protections for construction contracts, General(opens the original record on U.S. General Services Administration (Acquisition.gov, Federal Acquisition Regulation))U.S. General Services Administration (Acquisition.gov, Federal Acquisition Regulation)RegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction USLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Updated by Federal Acquisition CircularsID
far-28-102-1What this source supports (5)
- FAR 28.102-1(a) states that 40 U.S.C. chapter 31, subchapter III, Bonds, formerly known as the Miller Act, requires performance and payment bonds for any construction contract exceeding $150,000, except that this requirement may be waived, first by the contracting officer for work performed in a foreign country upon a finding that it is impracticable for the contractor to furnish the bonds, and second as otherwise authorized by the Bonds statute or by other law.
- Pursuant to 40 U.S.C. 3132, for construction contracts greater than $35,000 but not greater than $150,000, the contracting officer shall select two or more of the listed payment protections, giving particular consideration to inclusion of an irrevocable letter of credit as one of the selected alternatives.
- The payment protections the contracting officer selects from are a payment bond, an irrevocable letter of credit, a tripartite escrow agreement, certificates of deposit, and a deposit of the types of security listed in FAR 28.204-1 and 28.204-2.
- The contractor shall submit to the Government one of the payment protections selected by the contracting officer.
- The contractor shall furnish all bonds or alternative payment protection, including any necessary reinsurance agreements, before receiving a notice to proceed with the work or being allowed to start work.
Re-fetched 2026-08-31 from acquisition.gov, the publisher's own site, and the paragraph (a) and (b)(1) text was read against the part 28 page as well. Three corrections were made in this revision. The waiver clause in paragraph (a), previously dropped for lack of quotable detail, is now carried with both of its branches, because stating the $150,000 requirement without it overstates the rule. The list of payment protections previously stopped at four and omitted the fifth, a deposit of the types of security listed in 28.204-1 and 28.204-2. The bracket wording now follows the FAR, which reads not greater than $150,000. The separate card entry about the 40 U.S.C. 3132 citation was folded into the paragraph (b)(1) entry, where that citation actually appears. The FAR text contains no inflation-adjustment language, so this source is not used for any assertion about thresholds moving.
Active - [37]40 U.S.C. 3131 - Bonds of contractors of public buildings or works (Miller Act)(opens the original record on Office of the Law Revision Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives (uscode.house.gov))Office of the Law Revision Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives (uscode.house.gov)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction USLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended by act of Congress; codified in title 40 chapter 31 subchapter IIIID
usc-40-3131-miller-actWhat this source supports (8)
- In this subchapter, the term contractor means a person awarded a contract described in subsection (b).
- Before any contract of more than $100,000 is awarded for the construction, alteration, or repair of any public building or public work of the Federal Government, a person must furnish to the Government a performance bond and a payment bond, which become binding when the contract is awarded.
- The performance bond must be with a surety satisfactory to the officer awarding the contract, and in an amount the officer considers adequate, for the protection of the Government.
- The payment bond must be with a surety satisfactory to the officer for the protection of all persons supplying labor and material in carrying out the work provided for in the contract.
- The amount of the payment bond shall equal the total amount payable by the terms of the contract unless the officer awarding the contract determines, in a writing supported by specific findings, that a payment bond in that amount is impractical, in which case the contracting officer shall set the amount; the amount of the payment bond shall not be less than the amount of the performance bond.
- Every performance bond required under this section specifically shall provide coverage for taxes the Government imposes which are collected, deducted, or withheld from wages the contractor pays in carrying out the contract.
- A contracting officer may waive the requirement of a performance bond and payment bond for work under a contract that is to be performed in a foreign country if the officer finds that it is impracticable for the contractor to furnish the bonds.
- This section does not limit the authority of a contracting officer to require a performance bond or other security in addition to those, or in cases other than the cases, specified in subsection (b).
Re-verified 2026-08-31 on the Office of the Law Revision Counsel site, the official publisher of the United States Code; the $100,000 figure in subsection (b) is confirmed as the current statutory threshold. The source URL was moved from the Cornell LII reproduction to uscode.house.gov in this revision. Two statutory branches that the earlier draft omitted are now on the card: subsection (d), the foreign-country waiver, and subsection (e), which preserves the contracting officer's authority to require bonds or other security beyond and outside subsection (b). An earlier version of this card also misquoted the payment bond rule as a written determination that a lesser amount is adequate; the statute says the awarding officer must determine, in a writing supported by specific findings, that a payment bond in the total-contract-price amount is impractical.
Active - [38]41 U.S.C. 1908 - Inflation adjustment of acquisition-related dollar thresholds(opens the original record on Office of the Law Revision Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives (uscode.house.gov))Office of the Law Revision Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives (uscode.house.gov)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction USLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended by act of CongressID
usc-41-1908-acquisition-thresholdsWhat this source supports (5)
- On October 1 of each year evenly divisible by 5, the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council shall adjust each acquisition-related dollar threshold provided by law, as described in the section.
- The adjustment requirement applies to a dollar threshold specified in law as a factor in defining the scope of the applicability of a policy, procedure, requirement, or restriction provided in that law to the procurement of property or services by an executive agency, as the Council determines, except as provided in the exceptions paragraph.
- The adjustment does not apply to dollar thresholds in sections 3131 through 3134 of title 40, except that any modification of any such dollar threshold made by regulation and in effect on the date of the enactment of that subparagraph shall remain in effect.
- The adjustment also does not apply to dollar thresholds in chapters 67 and 83 of title 41, in sections 3141 to 3144, 3146, and 3147 of title 40, or to thresholds the United States Trade Representative establishes under title III of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979.
- Adjustments are calculated on the basis of changes in the Consumer Price Index for all-urban consumers published monthly by the Secretary of Labor.
Re-verified 2026-08-31 on uscode.house.gov, the official publisher of the United States Code; the source URL was moved there from the Cornell LII reproduction in this revision. Subsections (a), (b) including the exceptions paragraph, and (c) were read there, and the Consumer Price Index basis appears in the section's adjustment provision. Used to explain the relationship between the Miller Act's $100,000 and the FAR's $150,000 instead of presenting them as an unexplained conflict. The card deliberately does not state the enactment date of the title 40 exception because the statutory text refers to it only as the date of the enactment of that subparagraph.
Active - [39]Fast Facts: A Guide to Contractor License Bonds (Rev. 12/22)(opens the original record on California Contractors State License Board (CSLB), Department of Consumer Affairs)California Contractors State License Board (CSLB), Department of Consumer AffairsRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Revised periodically by CSLB; the fetched edition is marked Rev. 12/22ID
cslb-license-bonds-fast-factsWhat this source supports (11)
- To get a California contractor license, contractors must post a surety bond or cashier's check with CSLB.
- The bond or cashier's check is filed for the benefit of consumers who may be damaged because of defective construction or other violations of contractors' state license law, and for employees who have not been paid wages they are owed.
- Contractors commonly use a surety bond, referred to as a contractor license bond, where a surety company promises the State of California that it will pay damages if the contractor violates contractors' state license law.
- The current amount of the contractor license bond is $25,000; the bond amount is not per job, it is the amount available for all the jobs a contractor takes on during the life of the bond.
- Once the bond has been depleted, a contractor must purchase a new one for the license to remain in effect.
- Those who can make a claim against a contractor bond include any homeowner who contracts for home improvements or for construction of a single-family dwelling damaged because of a violation of contractors' state license law by the licensee; someone damaged as a result of a willful and deliberate violation of that law or by fraud committed by a licensee in the execution or performance of a construction contract; any employee of the licensee damaged by failure to pay wages; and any person or entity damaged as a result of the licensee's failure to pay fringe benefits for eligible employees.
- To file a claim against a bond, a consumer should contact the contractor's surety company and include a detailed written description of the problem, a copy of the contract, and all other pertinent documents and information.
- The guide states that a consumer who is not satisfied with the response of the surety company may take the contractor to small claims court for amounts up to $10,000, and that claims above $10,000 must be filed in a superior court.
- CSLB may require a separate bond, referred to as a disciplinary bond, for contractors who have been disciplined, and some license qualifiers, including responsible managing employees, are required to have a $25,000 bond on file with CSLB.
- The surety company will investigate any claim filed against the bond and CSLB will investigate any complaint filed against the license, and CSLB and the surety company will independently resolve the issues under their respective jurisdictions.
- The document carries the footer Rev. 12/22.
Downloaded 2026-08-31 and extracted with pdftotext, then read in full. publishedDate is month-only because the document states only Rev. 12/22; the earlier 2022-12-01 value invented a day. The guide's $10,000 small claims figure is quoted here as the guide's own wording and is flagged in the entry as superseded by Code of Civil Procedure section 116.221. The guide does not say the bond is insurance for the contractor, does not describe any reimbursement duty, and does not say CSLB declines to adjudicate bond claims. Published: 2022-12
Active - [40]California Business and Professions Code section 7071.6 - Contractor's bond(opens the original record on California Legislative Counsel (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov))California Legislative Counsel (leginfo.legislature.ca.gov)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended by act of the LegislatureID
ca-bpc-7071-6-contractor-bondWhat this source supports (6)
- The board shall require as a condition precedent to the issuance, reinstatement, reactivation, renewal, or continued maintenance of a license, that the applicant or licensee file or have on file a contractor's bond in the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000).
- Excluding the claims brought by the beneficiaries specified in subdivision (a) of Section 7071.5, the aggregate liability of a surety on claims brought against a bond required by this section shall not exceed the sum of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500).
- The bond proceeds in excess of seven thousand five hundred dollars ($7,500) shall be reserved exclusively for the claims of the beneficiaries specified in subdivision (a) of Section 7071.5.
- A bond shall not be required of a holder of a license that has been inactivated on the official records of the board during the period the license is inactive.
- Notwithstanding any other law, as a condition precedent to licensure, the board may require an applicant to post a contractor's bond in twice the amount required pursuant to subdivision (a) until the time that the license is renewed, where the applicant has either been convicted of a violation of Section 7028 or has been cited pursuant to Section 7028.7, where any such citation has been reduced to a final order of the registrar, and where the violation or the basis for the citation constituted a substantial injury to the public.
- The section carries the notation Repealed and added by Stats. 2021, Ch. 367, Sec. 17 (SB 607), effective January 1, 2022, operative January 1, 2023.
Re-verified 2026-08-31 against the California Legislative Counsel's own text; subdivisions (a) through (d) and the legislative history were read verbatim, and the $25,000 figure in subdivision (a) is confirmed as the current amount. publishedDate reflects the chaptering of SB 607 (Stats. 2021, Ch. 367); effectiveDate is the January 1, 2022 effective date, with a January 1, 2023 operative date. Two omissions were repaired in this revision. The earlier fetch returned only the first sentence of subdivision (b), so the card was silent on where proceeds above the $7,500 cap go; the second sentence, reserving them exclusively for the section 7071.5(a) beneficiaries, is now carried, because the cap alone reads as though the rest of the bond is unavailable to anyone. Subdivision (d), which lets the board require a bond in twice the subdivision (a) amount on the three stated conditions, was missing entirely and has been added. An inference about the bond being imposed by statute rather than by contract remains out of the claims array. Published: 2021-10-08 Effective: 2022-01-01
Active - [41]California Workers' Compensation Uniform Statistical Reporting Plan-1995, Title 10, California Code of Regulations Section 2318.6, Effective September 1, 2026(opens the original record on Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California, as approved by the California Insurance Commissioner)Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California, as approved by the California Insurance CommissionerPrimary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended at least annually, with revisions typically effective September 1.ID
ca-usrp-1995-2318-6What this source supports (24)
- The cover page reads: California Workers' Compensation Uniform Statistical Reporting Plan-1995, Title 10, California Code of Regulations Section 2318.6, Effective September 1, 2026.
- The Memorandum regarding the September 1, 2026 revisions states that Part 1, Section I, Introduction, Rule 3, Effective Date, was amended to show that the effective date of the amended Uniform Statistical Reporting Plan is 12:01 AM, September 1, 2026.
- Part 3, Section III, Rule 1a: any business or operation specifically described by a classification shall be assigned to that classification. Rule 1b: any business or operation not described by a classification shall be assigned to the classification(s) most analogous from the standpoint of process and hazard.
- In determining the most analogous classification, Rule 1b directs consideration of factors that differ by activity, including for manufacturers the industry type, finished goods, raw materials, and types of tools and equipment and how employees use them; for stores the types of products sold, who purchases them and how they are sold; for service providers the type of services, who contracts for them and where they are provided; for construction or erection the types of structures, raw materials and equipment and the type of contractor's license required; and for agriculture the crops cultivated and animals raised, the methods used, and the machinery, tools and equipment used.
- Part 3, Section III, Rule 1c: any business or operation described by a classification defined as a Standard Exception shall be classified in the Standard Exception classification; however, when a Standard Exception is assigned to the basic business or operation, all employees not specifically included in the definitions for such Standard Exceptions shall be separately classified, all other conditions contained in the Plan notwithstanding. The worked example following Rule 1c assigns all operations of an investment firm to Classification 8810, Clerical Office Employees, except an employee who maintains the facility, who is assigned to Classification 9015(1), Building Operation - N.O.C. - all other employees.
- Part 3, Section III, Rule 2 (Single Enterprise): if the employer's business, conducted at one or more locations, consists of a single operation or a number of separate operations that normally prevail in the business described by a single classification, the entire exposure of the business shall be assigned to that single classification, and no division of payroll shall be permitted in respect to any other operation unless the applicable classification phraseology or other provisions of the Plan specifically provide for it.
- The Single Enterprise worked example describes a full service restaurant whose staff includes chefs, bakers, dishwashers, wait staff, janitors and car parking valets, plus a storage facility at an additional location holding restaurant supplies; because those operations normally prevail in the operation of a full service restaurant, Classification 9080, Restaurants - full service, applies to all of the employees.
- Part 3, Section III, Rule 3 (Multiple Enterprises): two or more distinct operations that do not normally prevail in the business described by a single classification are separately classified only if physically separated; if two or more distinct operations are not physically separated, they shall be assigned to the highest-rated classification applicable to the distinct operations conducted in the common workspace. Division of payroll is permitted only if the operation is not described by any General Inclusion, the division is not contrary to classification phraseology, and the division is not contrary to other provisions of the Plan.
- Part 3, Section IV lists eight Special Industry Classification Procedures: Aircraft Operation; Construction or Erection Work; Electronic Products Design and Manufacturing; Farms; Stores; Wrecking or Demolition and Building Raising or Moving; Labor Contractors; and Property Management/Operation.
- Part 3, Section IV, Rule 2 (Construction or Erection Work) is the location of the wording 'Operations for which separate records of payroll are not maintained shall be assigned to the highest rated classification applicable to the job or location if payrolls are kept separately by job within the policy period; otherwise, the highest rated classification shall be assigned based on the entire policy period.' This wording sits in the construction divided-payroll rule and is not the general recordkeeping rule.
- Part 3, Section IV, Rule 2a (Determination of Dual Wage Construction or Erection Classification): a classification that requires the regular hourly wage to equal or exceed a specified amount may be used only upon verification that the employee is paid an hourly wage that equals or exceeds the specified amount. For all employees other than salaried employees, determination of the regular hourly wage must be supported by original time cards or time book entries for each employee, or by a valid collective bargaining agreement that shows the regular hourly wage rate by job classification of worker; payroll for which an hourly wage determination cannot be reconciled to those records shall not be assigned to a classification that requires the regular hourly wage to equal or exceed a specified amount.
- Part 3, Section V, Rule 2 (Payroll Records): if the employer fails to keep complete and accurate records of the remuneration earned by all officers and employees in sufficient detail to permit the proper classification of payroll and to make them available for examination by the insurer, the total remuneration earned shall be assigned to the highest rated classification describing any part of the work.
- Part 3, Section V, Rule 3 (Division of Single Employee's Payroll): the remuneration of any one employee may be divided between two or more classifications only if the employer has maintained complete and accurate records supported by original time cards or time book entries showing separately, both by individual employee and in summary by operations performed, the remuneration earned by such employee. Division shall not be allowed in connection with Standard Exception classifications or if the division is contrary to classification phraseology. If the employer fails to keep such records, the entire remuneration of the employee shall be assigned to the highest rated classification applicable to any part of the work performed by the employee. Payroll may not be divided by means of percentages, averages, estimates, or any basis other than specific time records.
- Part 3, Section VI, Rule 1: the WCIRB has authority to inspect the premises of any employer for classification assignment purposes and is responsible for conducting a comprehensive inspection program to ensure that insurers use the proper classifications in reporting payroll and losses.
- Part 3, Section VI, Rule 2: if the WCIRB has made a classification assignment as the result of a WCIRB inspection, notice of the classification(s) assigned shall be published by providing the inspection report to either the insurer of record at the time the inspection was conducted or the insurer of record at the time the report is released, and the WCIRB shall provide a copy of the inspection report to the employer within 30 days from the date the inspection report is published. An insurer is not relieved of the obligation to report an applicable WCIRB classification assignment because of lack of knowledge that notice has been published by the WCIRB.
- Part 3, Section VI, Rule 3a: if the classification assignment represents a reclassification of the employer's operations that is not the result of a change of operations or a reallocation or assignment of payroll to existing classifications on the policy, the classification shall be published and effective as provided in Rules 3a(1) and 3a(2).
- Part 3, Section VI, Rule 3a(1): if the classification carries a pure premium rate higher than that of the erroneous classification, it shall be effective as of the effective date of the erroneous classification assignment provided (a) the classification assignment is published within three months of the effective date of the erroneous assignment, (b) the WCIRB was notified, in writing, within three months of the effective date of the erroneous assignment of a possible error, or (c) the WCIRB notified the insurer of record, in writing, within three months of the effective date of the erroneous assignment that the erroneous assignment was under review. Otherwise, the revised assignment shall be effective as of the date it is published, unless it is published less than three months prior to the expiration of the outstanding policy, in which case it shall be effective as of the inception date of the policy which replaces the outstanding policy.
- Part 3, Section VI, Rule 3a(2), first sentence: if the classification carries a pure premium rate lower than that of the erroneous classification, it shall be effective as of the inception date of a policy outstanding on the date the insurer of record is notified by the WCIRB, in writing, that the erroneous assignment is under review. Second sentence: the assignment also shall be applied as of the inception date of a policy that expired no more than twelve (12) months prior to the date the assignment was published or the insurer of record was notified by the WCIRB, in writing, that the erroneous assignment was under review, provided the erroneous assignment was applicable to such policy.
- Part 3, Section VI, Rule 3b: a classification assignment due to a change of operations shall be published and effective as of the date of the change of operations, regardless of the resulting pure premium rate. Rule 3c: a reallocation or assignment of payroll to existing classifications on a policy shall be effective as of the inception date of the policy.
- Part 3, Section VI, Rule 4a(3): each policy producing a final premium of less than $10,500 and developing exposure in a dual wage construction or erection classification that requires the regular hourly wage to equal or exceed a specified amount shall be physically audited, unless the policy is a renewal and the insurer physically audited one of the two immediately preceding policy periods.
- The Memorandum states that the September 1, 2026 revisions amend Part 3, Section V, Rule 1, Subrules j, k, l and m to adjust the minimum and maximum payroll limitations for executive officers, partners, individual employers and members of a limited liability company, to reflect wage inflation since those limitations were last amended in 2025.
- The Memorandum raises the annual payroll limitation from $165,100 to $171,600 for thirty-four separately listed classifications, each stated as reflecting wage inflation since the payroll limitation was last amended in 2025. The full set is: 9181 Athletic Teams or Athletic Facilities (for players, per player per season); 9610 Motion Pictures - production (for actors, musicians, producers and the motion picture director, per person); and, per employee, 7607(2) Audio Post-Production, 7607(1) Video Post-Production, 8803 Auditing, Accounting or Management Consulting Services, 8808 Banks, 8801 Credit Unions, 8749 Mortgage Bankers, 8743 Mortgage Brokers, 8822 Insurance Companies, 8820 Law Firms, 4512 Biomedical Research Laboratories, 8859(1) Computer Programming or Software Development, 8859(2) Internet or Web-Based Application Development or Operation, 8601(1) Engineers, 8601(2) Oil or Gas Geologists or Scouts, 8601(4) Forest Engineers, 8874(1) Instrument Mfg. - electronic - professional or scientific - hardware or software design or development, 8874(2) Computer or Computer Peripheral Equipment Mfg. - hardware or software design or development, 8874(3) Telecommunications Equipment Mfg. - hardware or software design or development, 8874(4) Audio/Video Electronic Products Mfg. - hardware or software design or development, 8874(5) Integrated Circuit and Semiconductor Wafer Mfg. - hardware or software design or development, 8874(6) Medical Instrument Mfg. - electronic - diagnostic or treatment - hardware or software design or development, 8874(7) Instrument Mfg. - non-electronic - scientific or medical - hardware or software design or development, 8839 Dental or Orthodontia Practices, 9043 Hospitals, 8834 Physicians' Practices and Outpatient Clinics, 4297(1) Electronic Pre-Press, 4297(2) Graphic Design, 8807 Newspaper, 7610 Radio, 8741 Real Estate Agencies, 9156 Theaters - dance, and 9151 Theaters - musical entertainment.
- The Memorandum eliminates certain classifications with their operations reassigned, including Classification 3070, Computer Memory Disk Mfg., eliminated due to low statistical credibility with its operations reassigned to Classification 3681(2), Computer or Computer Peripheral Equipment Mfg. - all other employees, and Classification 2102, Fruit or Vegetable Evaporation or Dehydrating, eliminated due to its limited statistical credibility with its operations reassigned to Classification 2111(1), Fruit or Vegetable Preserving. Classification 2111(3), Fruit or Vegetable Pickling, was also eliminated as an alternate phraseology for clarity and its operations reassigned to Classification 2111(1).
- The Memorandum lists twenty-five pairs of classifications whose hourly wage threshold was increased effective September 1, 2026, each stated as reflecting wage inflation since the threshold was last amended in 2024: 5185/5186 Automatic Sprinkler Installation, $33.00 to $36.00; 5403/5432 Carpentry, $41.00 to $46.00; 5201(2)/5205(2) Concrete or Cement Work - pouring or finishing of concrete floor slabs and concrete slab-type foundations, $33.00 to $36.00; 5201(1)/5205(1) Concrete or Cement Work - pouring or finishing of concrete sidewalks, driveways, patios, curbs or gutters, $33.00 to $36.00; 5190/5140 Electrical Wiring, $36.00 to $40.00; 6218(1)/6220(1) Excavation, $40.00 to $45.00; 6315(2)/6316(2) Gas Mains or Connections Construction, $40.00 to $45.00; 5467/5470 Glaziers, $39.00 to $43.00; 6218(2)/6220(2) Grading Land, $40.00 to $45.00; 5538(2)/5542(2) Heating or Air Conditioning Ductwork, $33.00 to $37.00; 5183(3)/5187(3) Heating or Air Conditioning Equipment, $32.00 to $35.00; 6218(3)/6220(3) Land Leveling, $40.00 to $45.00; 5027/5028 Masonry, $35.00 to $37.00; 5474(1)/5482(1) Painting or Wallpaper Installation, $32.00 to $36.00; 5474(3)/5482(3) Painting - water, oil or gasoline storage tanks, $32.00 to $36.00; 5484/5485 Plastering or Stucco Work, $38.00 to $42.00; 5183(1)/5187(1) Plumbing, $32.00 to $35.00; 5183(2)/5187(2) Refrigeration Equipment, $32.00 to $35.00; 5552/5553 Roofing, $31.00 to $33.00; 6307/6308 Sewer Construction, $40.00 to $45.00; 5538(1)/5542(1) Sheet Metal Work, $33.00 to $37.00; 5632/5633 Steel Framing, $41.00 to $46.00; 5446/5447 Wallboard Installation, $41.00 to $45.00; 6315(1)/6316(1) Water Mains or Connections Construction, $40.00 to $45.00; and 5474(2)/5482(2) Waterproofing, $32.00 to $36.00.
Re-fetched and re-verified 2026-08-31 over HTTPS with a browser user agent (WebFetch gets 403), HTTP 200, 3,336,865 bytes; full text extracted with pdftotext -layout (1,375,272 characters) and read directly. Cover page, the full Memorandum, Section III Rules 1 through 3, the Section IV rule list and Rules 2 and 2a, Section V Rules 2 and 3, and Section VI Rules 1 through 4 were all read in the extracted text. Standing corrections from the previous pass, all re-confirmed today against the extracted text: (1) the dual wage list was completed - the Memorandum increases the hourly wage threshold for twenty-five pairs of classifications, not only 5185/5186, and all twenty-five are enumerated with their old and new thresholds; (2) the Section VI, Rule 3 claim was split into Rules 3a, 3a(1), 3a(2), 3b and 3c, adding the 'Otherwise' fallback in 3a(1) and the second sentence of 3a(2), which extends a downward correction back to a policy that expired no more than twelve months before publication or written notice; (3) the Section VI, Rule 2 claim was narrowed to the rule's actual wording, which names either the insurer of record at the time the inspection was conducted or the insurer of record at the time the report is released. VERIFICATION PERFORMED THIS PASS: the count of dual wage threshold amendments was checked mechanically over the whole extracted document, not just the memorandum - the string 'hourly wage threshold from $' occurs exactly 25 times document-wide, and each occurrence was resolved to its classification pair; the enumerated list matches those 25 exactly, so the set is complete and no pair is missing. Section VI, Rule 3a(2) was re-read in full and both sentences are present as claimed; the rule number is current (Section VI, Rule 3 is titled 'Effective Date of Standard Classification Assignments' in this edition). Section III Rules 1a, 1b, 1c, 2 and 3, Section IV Rules 2 and 2a, Section V Rules 2 and 3, and Section VI Rules 1, 2 and 4a(3) were each re-read and each cited rule number matches the rule that actually carries the quoted wording in this edition. The 'highest rated classification applicable to the job or location' wording was located mechanically: it occurs exactly once in the document, inside Section IV, Rule 2, confirming the scope note below. CORRECTIONS MADE THIS PASS: (a) the memorandum claim was split into three, and the payroll limitation list was completed - the previous claim named nine classifications behind the word 'including', which understated the change the same way the dual wage claim once did; the Memorandum raises the $165,100 annual payroll limitation to $171,600 for thirty-four separately listed classifications, and all thirty-four are now enumerated, verified by resolving each of the 34 memorandum occurrences of 'from $165,100 to $171,600' to its classification; (b) the elimination claim was corrected to carry the plan's stated reasons (low or limited statistical credibility) and to add Classification 2111(3), Fruit or Vegetable Pickling, reassigned to 2111(1), which the earlier claim omitted; (c) two dual wage classification descriptions were corrected to the memorandum's own wording - the 5201/5205 pair is 'pouring or finishing of concrete' floor slabs and slab-type foundations and sidewalks, driveways, patios, curbs or gutters, and 5474(3)/5482(3) is 'Painting - water, oil or gasoline storage tanks', not 'Painting of'. The 5201/5205 and 8874 descriptions are abbreviated from longer official phraseologies and are not verbatim renderings. IMPORTANT SCOPE NOTE carried in the claims themselves: the phrase 'highest rated classification applicable to the job or location' appears only in Section IV, Rule 2 (Construction or Erection Work). The general rules use different wording (Section V, Rule 2: 'the highest rated classification describing any part of the work'; Section V, Rule 3: 'the highest rated classification applicable to any part of the work performed by the employee'). This edition is not in force on 2026-08-31; it takes effect at 12:01 AM on 2026-09-01, and the prose names the edition every time it relies on it. The title field uses ASCII hyphens where the official title is typeset with an em dash, so it is a normalized rather than verbatim rendering. Published: 2026-06-01 Effective: 2026-09-01
Active - [42]About Us - WCIRB California(opens the original record on Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB))Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB)Standards bodySecondaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Static organizational page.ID
wcirb-about-usWhat this source supports (3)
- The WCIRB was organized in 1915 as a California unincorporated, private, nonprofit association, operates under the authority of the California Insurance Code, is licensed by the State of California, and is the Insurance Commissioner's designated statistical agent.
- The WCIRB is comprised of all companies licensed to transact workers' compensation insurance in California, and it is led by a Governing Committee comprised of seven private insurers elected by the membership, the State Compensation Insurance Fund and four public members appointed by the Insurance Commissioner.
- The WCIRB describes its work as providing accurate advisory pure premium rates, experience modifications and standard classification assignments.
Re-fetched and re-verified 2026-08-31 over HTTPS with a browser user agent (WebFetch gets 403), HTTP 200, 95,111 bytes. All three claims matched as literal strings. The Governing Committee claim was widened on this pass from 'includes four public members' to the page's full composition sentence, because the narrower version left out the elected private insurers and the State Compensation Insurance Fund. URL RE-CHECKED 2026-08-31: HTTP 200, no redirect, 95,223 bytes. All three claims re-matched today, including the full Governing Committee composition (seven private insurers, the State Compensation Insurance Fund, four public members).
Active - [43]NCCI Basic Manual Rule 1 - Assignment of Classifications(opens the original record on North Carolina Rate Bureau digital library, reproducing the NCCI Basic Manual for Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance)North Carolina Rate Bureau digital library, reproducing the NCCI Basic Manual for Workers Compensation and Employers Liability InsuranceStandards bodySecondaryJurisdiction USThird-party reproductionLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: NCCI amends the Basic Manual by filing; confirm the current rule text and state exceptions for the applicable jurisdiction before publication.ID
ncci-basic-manual-rule-1What this source supports (6)
- Rule 1 states that, subject to certain exceptions, it is the business of the employer within a state that is classified, not the separate employments, occupations, or operations within the business.
- Rule 1 states that the governing classification at a specific location or job is the basic classification, other than a standard exception classification, and is determined in accordance with the Governing Classification Determination Table, under which the basic classification producing the greatest amount of payroll governs.
- Rule 1 lists five standard exception classifications: Code 8810 Clerical Office Employees NOC, Code 8871 Clerical Office Telecommuter Employees, Code 8742 Salespersons or Collectors - Outside, Code 7380 Drivers, Chauffeurs, Messengers, and Their Helpers NOC - Commercial, and Code 8748 Automobile Salespersons.
- Rule 1 conditions Code 8810 treatment on the clerical work area being physically separated from the operating hazards by at least one of floors, walls, partitions, counters, or other physical barriers.
- Rule 1 treats certain general inclusions, such as a restaurant or cafeteria operated for employees and equipment repair, as part of the basic classification rather than separately classified, and treats general exclusions, specifically aviation (all operations), new construction or alterations, stevedoring, and sawmill operations, as separately classified unless included in the basic classification wording.
- Rule 1 states that each type of construction, erection, or oil and gas field operation is assigned to the classification describing that operation only if separate payroll records are maintained for each operation.
ActiveReproduction - [44]About NCCI (NCCI Fact Sheet)(opens the original record on National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI))National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI)Standards bodySecondaryJurisdiction USLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Refreshed periodically; the version fetched carries a document footer reading Updated 6/9/26 and premium data reported in 2025.ID
ncci-fact-sheetWhat this source supports (5)
- NCCI's mission is to foster a healthy workers compensation system through its role as a licensed rating, advisory, and statistical organization.
- NCCI maintains the workers compensation infrastructure of classifications, rules, plans, and forms.
- NCCI recommends objective and actuarially appropriate rates or loss costs that are filed with NCCI states for approval.
- The document's state map carries the caption: this map is a reference of states plus the District of Columbia where NCCI is a licensed rating, advisory and statistical organization and acts as the Residual Market Plan Administrator.
- NCCI administers the Plan in 23 states and the Pool in 27 states for the residual market.
Re-fetched and re-verified 2026-08-31 over HTTPS (HTTP 200, 978,609 bytes); text extracted with pdftotext -layout (5,177 characters) and read in full. All five claims were matched in the extracted text. Standing corrections: an earlier draft appended a gloss to the map-caption claim reading 'meaning NCCI's role is confined to the states whose insurance departments have designated it'; that language is nowhere on the page and stays deleted, leaving only the caption. publishedDate is 2026-06-09, matching the document footer 'Updated 6/9/26'. LIMITATION: the state list is rendered only as a map image, so pdftotext recovers no state abbreviations. This source is therefore never used to assert which states NCCI serves, any count of NCCI or independent-bureau states, or California's status; California's status is carried only by ncci-abcs-experience-rating, which names it in text. URL RE-CHECKED 2026-08-31: HTTP 200, no redirect, 978,609 bytes; the extracted text is 5,177 characters and was re-read in full today. The footer again reads Updated 6/9/26 and the premium figure is again marked (reported in 2025). The mission sentence on the page abbreviates workers compensation to WC, which the claim expands using the page's own defined abbreviation. The LIMITATION below still holds: the state list is a map image and pdftotext recovers no state abbreviations from it. Published: 2026-06-09
Active - [45]Workers' Compensation (Commercial Insurance Guide series)(opens the original record on California Department of Insurance)California Department of InsuranceRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Updated periodically by CDI; the page carries its own revision date, so re-check it before each content review cycle.ID
cdi-wc-commercial-guideWhat this source supports (22)
- CDI states that all California employers must provide workers compensation benefits to their employees under California Labor Code Section 3700.
- CDI states that there are five basic types of workers compensation benefits: medical care, temporary disability benefits, permanent disability benefits, supplemental job displacement benefits, and death benefits.
- CDI states that employers' liability insurance is offered under Part Two of a workers' compensation and employers' liability insurance policy, and that Part Two protects the employer against instances in which an employee's injury or disease is not subject to the workers' compensation laws.
- CDI states that classifications that group distinct and identifiable occupations, industries, or businesses are developed and assigned codes by the Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB) and are approved by the Insurance Commissioner.
- CDI states that the payroll for each classification is estimated and then multiplied, per each $100 of payroll, by the applicable rate.
- CDI states that generally an experience modification of less than 100 percent reflects better-than-average experience and an experience modification of more than 100 percent reflects worse-than-average experience, and describes the modification as comparing an employer's loss history against similar-sized employers in the same industry classification.
- CDI states that California workers compensation insurers operate under an open rating system, meaning individual companies set rates based on their ability to adequately cover losses and expenses in each industry classification.
- CDI states that workers' compensation insurers assign a specific rate to each industry classification code and that these rates must be filed with the CDI.
- CDI states that the final premium of a workers' compensation policy cannot be calculated until the policy term is over and the employer's payroll records have been audited.
- CDI states that a dividend plan is a type of rating plan that allows an employer to share in the profits of its workers' compensation insurer in the form of a dividend.
- CDI states that to become self-insured a business must obtain a certificate from the DIR's Office of Self-Insurance Plans (OSIP).
- CDI states that State Fund is a state-operated entity that exists in order to transact workers' compensation on a non-profit basis, competes with private workers' compensation insurance companies for business, and also operates as the insurer of last resort if private companies are not willing to offer workers' compensation insurance.
- Classifications that group distinct and identifiable occupations, industries, or business are developed and assigned codes by the Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB) and are approved by the Insurance Commissioner.
- Workers' compensation insurers generally use these classifications when writing workers' compensation policies.
- Insurance companies are allowed to develop and submit their own classification system to the CDI for approval, but this is uncommon due to the strict standards required to file a separate workers' compensation classification system.
- The payroll for each classification is estimated and then multiplied, per each $100 of payroll, by the applicable rate, and the sum of the equation is referred to as the base premium.
- The base premium continues to be modified, increased or decreased, using rating plans (usually schedule or judgment rating) and by experience modification.
- An employer's experience modification is calculated from payroll and loss information that insurance companies are required to submit to the WCIRB on an annual basis, using a mathematical formula approved by the CDI.
- An experience modification of less than 100 percent reflects better-than-average experience, and an experience modification of more than 100 percent reflects worse-than-average experience.
- The WCIRB provides a policyholder ombudsman, who is available to answer questions from employers on classification, experience modification, and rating issues.
- The final premium of a workers' compensation policy cannot be calculated until the policy term is over and the employer's payroll records have been audited.
- Title 10, California Code of Regulations Sections 2509.40 through 2509.78 list detailed procedures for disputing experience modifications and classification assignments, including appeals to the CDI.
Published: 2025-06-23
Active - [46]California Insurance Code Section 11737(opens the original record on California Legislative Information (California Legislature))California Legislative Information (California Legislature)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Statute; amended by the Legislature from time to time.ID
ca-ins-code-11737What this source supports (6)
- Subdivision (f): every insurer or rating organization shall provide within this state reasonable means whereby any person aggrieved by the application of its filings may be heard by the insurer or rating organization on written request to review the manner in which the rating system has been applied in connection with the insurance afforded or offered.
- Subdivision (f): if the insurer or rating organization fails to grant or reject the request within 30 days, the applicant may proceed in the same manner as if the application had been rejected.
- Subdivision (f): any party affected by the action of the insurer or rating organization on the request may appeal, within 30 days after written notice of the action, to the commissioner who, after a hearing held within 60 days from the date on which the party requests the appeal, or longer upon agreement of the parties and not less than 10 days' written notice to the appellant and to the insurer or rating organization, may affirm, modify, or reverse that action.
- Subdivision (f), final branch: if the commissioner has information on the subject from which the appeal is taken and believes that a reasonable basis for the appeal does not exist or that the appeal is not made in good faith, the commissioner may deny the appeal without a hearing; the denial shall be in writing, set forth the basis for the denial, and be served on all parties.
- Subdivision (b): the commissioner may disapprove rates if the commissioner determines that premiums charged, in the aggregate, resulting from the use of the rates or the rates as modified by any supplementary rate information, would be inadequate to cover an insurer's losses and expenses, unfairly discriminatory, or tend to create a monopoly in the market pursuant to Section 11732, 11732.5, or 11733.
- Subdivision (c): the commissioner shall disapprove rates if the commissioner determines that premiums charged, in the aggregate, resulting from the use of the rates or the rates as modified by any supplementary rate information would, if continued in use, tend to impair or threaten the solvency of an insurer.
Re-fetched and re-verified 2026-08-31 by WebFetch (HTTP 200) and independently over HTTPS (HTTP 200, 170,201 bytes); the URL resolves to the section text, not a search shell. The review-and-appeal mechanism sits at subdivision (f) in the current text, whereas the 2001 E M Machining decision quotes it as subdivision (c); the subdivision letter here is taken from the statute as fetched today and is not attributed to the older decision. The 30-day appeal clock runs from written notice of the action, which is the wording used in the prose. Standing correction from an earlier pass: the subdivision (b) and (c) claims were rewritten to the statute's own wording, because the earlier one-line paraphrase compressed (b) to 'rates that are inadequate', dropping 'inadequate to cover an insurer's losses and expenses' and the cross-references, and merged (b) and (c) into a single sentence. NEW ON THIS PASS - OMITTED STATUTORY BRANCH: the subdivision (f) appeal claim previously stopped at 'to the commissioner', which left a reader with the impression that a timely appeal produces a hearing. The statute as fetched today does not say that. The same sentence continues that the commissioner acts 'after a hearing held within 60 days from the date on which the party requests the appeal, or longer upon agreement of the parties and not less than 10 days' written notice', and the subdivision closes with a separate branch under which the commissioner MAY DENY THE APPEAL WITHOUT A HEARING where the commissioner believes no reasonable basis for the appeal exists or that it is not made in good faith, with a written denial served on all parties. Both the completed sentence and the denial branch were added as claims and both are now carried in the prose, because an appeal route stated without its denial branch overstates what the statute guarantees.
Active - [47]California Insurance Code Section 11734(opens the original record on California Legislative Information (California Legislature))California Legislative Information (California Legislature)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended by the Legislature; verify current text at leginfo.ID
ca-ins-code-11734What this source supports (3)
- Insurance Code section 11734(a) provides that every workers compensation insurer shall adhere to a uniform experience rating plan filed with the commissioner by a rating organization designated by the commissioner and subject to the commissioner's disapproval.
- Subdivision (b) provides for the commissioner to designate a rating organization to gather statistical information and develop a classification system, permits an insurer to use its own classification system if it is filed with the commissioner 30 days prior to use and the commissioner approves it, and requires insurers to report experience to the designated rating organization under the uniform statistical reporting plan.
- Subdivision (c) provides that the designated rating organization shall develop and file manual rules, subject to the approval of the commissioner, reasonably related to the recording and reporting of data pursuant to the uniform statistical plan, uniform experience rating plan, and any classification systems in effect.
Published: 2003-01-01 Effective: 2003-01-01
Active - [48]California Insurance Code Section 11735(opens the original record on California Legislative Information (California Legislature))California Legislative Information (California Legislature)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended by the Legislature; verify current text at leginfo.ID
ca-ins-code-11735What this source supports (3)
- Insurance Code section 11735(a) provides that every insurer shall file with the commissioner all rates and supplementary rate information that are to be used in this state, and requires the filing to be made not later than 30 days prior to the effective date.
- Filings of rates, supplementary rate information and supporting information are open to public inspection at any reasonable time as soon as filed.
- Subdivision (e) addresses deductible offerings and provides that a filing of supplementary rate information for a deductible is deemed complete only if it contains stated items, including a copy of the deductible endorsement that is to be attached to the policy and endorsement language addressing the injured worker's entitlement to benefits regardless of the deductible.
Published: 2003-01-01 Effective: 2003-01-01
Active - [49]Get Help - California Department of Insurance consumer assistance(opens the original record on California Department of Insurance)California Department of InsuranceRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Maintained on an ongoing basis by CDI consumer services.ID
cdi-getting-helpWhat this source supports (5)
- The California Department of Insurance publishes 1-800-927-4357 on this page for insurance information and questions, corroborating the Consumer Hotline number on a second official CDI page.
- The California Department of Insurance offers electronic complaint forms and also printable complaint forms.
- The page states that CDI recommends using the electronic complaint forms and that use of non-electronic complaint forms may delay the process.
- The page provides a Spanish-language help link (Como obtener ayuda).
- The California Department of Insurance lists its consumer hotline as 1-800-927-4357.
Active - [50]Contact Us(opens the original record on California Department of Insurance)California Department of InsuranceRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Updated as CDI office and phone details change; re-verify phone numbers before republishing.ID
cdi-contactWhat this source supports (6)
- The California Department of Insurance publishes a Consumer Hotline number of 800-927-4357 (HELP).
- The California Department of Insurance publishes a TTY number of 800-482-4833.
- The California Department of Insurance publishes 800-967-9331 under the label Licensing hotline, separately from the Consumer Hotline.
- The California Department of Insurance publishes a Fraud Division main line of 916-854-5760 and a Fraud Division email of fraud@insurance.ca.gov.
- The California Department of Insurance lists headquarters offices at 300 South Spring Street, 14th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90013 (213-346-6464); 300 Capitol Mall, 17th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814 (916-492-3500); and 1901 Harrison Street, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612 (415-538-4500).
- The Contact Us page does not state hours of operation for the Consumer Hotline or for any office.
Active - [51]California's Experience Rating System - Online Guide to Workers' Compensation(opens the original record on Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB))Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB)Standards bodyPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Maintained alongside annual amendments to the Experience Rating Plan.ID
wcirb-experience-rating-systemWhat this source supports (8)
- The regulations governing California's experience rating system are contained in the California Workers' Compensation Experience Rating Plan-1995, which is part of the California Code of Regulations (Title 10; Chapter 5, Section 2353.1) and is approved by the Insurance Commissioner.
- An experience modification, which is expressed as a percentage, compares the loss or claims history of one company to all other companies in the same industry that are similar in size.
- Generally, an experience modification of less than 100 percent reflects better-than-average experience, while an experience modification of more than 100 percent reflects worse-than-average experience.
- An experience modification that is greater than 100 percent usually increases the cost of an employer's workers' compensation insurance premiums, while an experience modification that is less than 100 percent usually decreases the cost of an employer's workers' compensation insurance premiums.
- Not all employers are eligible for experience rating; for those businesses that qualify, experience rating is mandatory.
- More than 130,000 California businesses are experience rated, representing approximately 80 percent of all California workers' compensation insurance premiums paid.
- Using information submitted by insurers, the WCIRB calculates and publishes experience modifications for each qualified business, and regardless of which insurer provides the workers' compensation insurance policy, if an employer is experience rated their experience modification must be applied to their policy.
- The experience rating system is a merit rating system intended to provide employers a direct financial incentive to reduce work-related accidents.
Re-fetched and re-verified 2026-08-31 over HTTPS with a browser user agent (WebFetch gets 403), HTTP 200, 104,063 bytes. All claims matched as literal strings. ATTRIBUTION CORRECTION on this pass: an earlier draft deleted the premium-direction claim and recorded in these notes that the page 'does not contain that language'. That note was wrong. The sentence 'Accordingly, an experience modification that is greater than 100 percent usually increases the cost of an employer's workers' compensation insurance premiums, while an experience modification that is less than 100 percent usually decreases the cost of an employer's workers' compensation insurance premiums' is on the page and was matched twice in the fetched bytes (once in the schema.org description, once in the rendered body). The claim has been restored and the prose now cites this source for the premium-direction point alongside the NCCI credit/debit/unity factor language. URL RE-CHECKED 2026-08-31: HTTP 200, no redirect, 104,135 bytes. The premium-direction sentence, the 130,000 businesses figure, the 80 percent figure, the Title 10 Chapter 5 Section 2353.1 citation and the merit rating system sentence were all re-matched on the page today, so the restored claim stands. A fresh grep for NCCI or National Council returns ZERO hits.
Active - [52]ABCs of Experience Rating(opens the original record on National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI))National Council on Compensation Insurance (NCCI)Standards bodyPrimaryJurisdiction USLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: NCCI educational publication; copyright line reads 1981-2025 and worked examples use 1/1/2026 mod effective dates.ID
ncci-abcs-experience-ratingWhat this source supports (14)
- Under manual rating, all employers are grouped according to their business operation or classification, and an employer is assigned to a classification to ensure that the rates reflect the costs of all employers with similar characteristics.
- The rates determined for manual rating are averages reflecting the normal conditions found in each classification.
- The rate, which is approved by the state for each classification, is applied per $100 of payroll; each $100 of payroll is multiplied by the rate to arrive at the premium for each classification; summing the premium for the classifications yields the initial total premium; and the modification is then applied to arrive at the modified premium.
- Experience rating compares the experience of individual employers with the average employer in the same classification, using individual payroll and loss records, and may result in an increase, decrease, or no change in premium.
- The modification applied to an employer's policy is either a unity (1.00) factor, a credit mod (lower than 1.00), or a debit mod (higher than 1.00).
- An employer qualifies for a mod if the subject premium meets a premium eligibility point, and eligibility criteria differ by state.
- The experience period is generally based on three years of payroll and loss data, but could range from less than 12 months of data up to 45 months of data.
- The payroll and claim or loss information used to calculate the mod comes from unit statistical reports that insurance providers are required to file with NCCI for each policy under NCCI's Statistical Plan.
- A contingent mod is issued when NCCI is expecting audited payroll and/or loss information but has not received it, and the mod is revised once the audited information arrives.
- As of this publication, 39 jurisdictions have approved and authorized the use of the Plan.
- The Plan does not apply in California, Delaware, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, or Pennsylvania, nor does it apply in the four monopolistic states (North Dakota, Ohio, Washington, and Wyoming) that administer their own plans and rates.
- The Plan applies in Indiana, Massachusetts, and North Carolina, but the independent rating organizations in these three states are responsible for producing their own intrastate mods; the independent rating organizations in Minnesota and Wisconsin permit combination with states that have approved the Plan for interstate experience rating, and those two states participate only if the employer has exposure in two or more participating states within the experience period.
- Where an employer has exposure in a participating state and a non-participating state, separate intrastate mods are produced by separate organizations; the worked example uses Florida, where NCCI develops the intrastate mod, and Pennsylvania, where the Pennsylvania bureau develops its own.
- On the NCCI Experience Rating Worksheet, payroll is described as the exposure, and the Expected Loss Rate is the amount of expected losses for the classification for each $100 of payroll.
Re-fetched and re-verified 2026-08-31 over HTTPS (HTTP 200, 1,063,233 bytes); text extracted with pdftotext -layout and read directly. Every claim above was read in the extracted text. The non-application sentence is quoted in full because it names California explicitly, and it is what the prose relies on for California's position. Added on this pass: the Indiana/Massachusetts/North Carolina and Minnesota/Wisconsin sentence, because without it the bare 'does not apply in California ... and the four monopolistic states' reads as though every other jurisdiction is administered identically by NCCI, which the same page contradicts. URL RE-CHECKED 2026-08-31: HTTP 200, no redirect, 1,063,233 bytes. Re-confirmed today. One wording note recorded for precision: the source prints the non-application point as two consecutive sentences, 'The Plan does not apply in California, Delaware, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, or Pennsylvania.' followed by 'Nor does it apply in the four monopolistic states (North Dakota, Ohio, Washington, and Wyoming) that administer their own plans and rates.' The claim joins the two with a lowercase 'nor' and adds nothing; it is a join, not a paraphrase.
Active - [53]California Labor Code Section 3700(opens the original record on California Legislative Information (California Legislature))California Legislative Information (California Legislature)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended by the Legislature; check leginfo for the current version before relying on it.ID
ca-labor-code-3700What this source supports (5)
- Labor Code section 3700 provides that every employer except the state shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the ways the section lists.
- One listed method is being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in California.
- Another listed method is securing from the Director of Industrial Relations a certificate of consent to self-insure, either as an individual employer or as one employer in a group of employers, upon proof satisfactory to the Director of ability to self-insure and to pay any compensation that may become due.
- A third listed method applies to counties, cities, municipal corporations, public districts, public agencies and other political subdivisions of the state, which may secure a certificate of consent to self-insure against workers compensation claims from the Director of Industrial Relations.
- The section states that for purposes of the section, state includes the superior courts.
Published: 2003-01-01 Effective: 2003-01-01
Active - [54]Classification Search - WCIRB California(opens the original record on Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB))Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau of California (WCIRB)Standards bodySecondaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Updated as classifications change.ID
wcirb-classification-searchWhat this source supports (2)
- Classification Search helps users locate classifications based on keywords that are part of, or commonly associated with, classification phraseologies.
- The page directs users to the Insurance Commissioner's rules regarding the Standard Classification System in Part 3, Standard Classification System, of the California Workers' Compensation Uniform Statistical Reporting Plan-1995.
Re-fetched and re-verified 2026-08-31 over HTTPS with a browser user agent (WebFetch gets 403), HTTP 200, 137,808 bytes. Both claims matched as literal strings. Cited only as a lookup pointer in nextActions, never for a substantive rule, and never for the classification that fits any particular business. URL RE-CHECKED 2026-08-31: HTTP 200, no redirect, 137,808 bytes. Both claims re-matched today, including the pointer to Part 3, Standard Classification System, of the Uniform Statistical Reporting Plan.
Active - [55]Workers' compensation for employers - Texas Department of Insurance(opens the original record on Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' Compensation)Texas Department of Insurance, Division of Workers' CompensationRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction TXLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Re-verify after each Texas legislative session.ID
tdi-wc-employerWhat this source supports (2)
- TDI states that in Texas, private employers can choose to carry workers' compensation insurance coverage, but it is not required in most cases.
- TDI states that an employer without coverage must report to the state that it does not have coverage, and must also report to the Division of Workers' Compensation any work-related injuries resulting in more than one day of lost time, as well as all work-related illnesses and deaths.
Active - [56]Employer coverage requirements - Florida Division of Workers' Compensation(opens the original record on Florida Department of Financial Services, Division of Workers' Compensation)Florida Department of Financial Services, Division of Workers' CompensationRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction FLLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Re-verify after each Florida legislative session.ID
fl-dfs-wc-requirementsWhat this source supports (3)
- The Division states that an employer in the construction industry with one or more employees, including himself or herself, is required to carry workers' compensation coverage.
- The Division states that an employer in an industry other than construction with four or more employees, full-time or part-time, is required to carry workers' compensation coverage.
- The Division states that an employer who is a farmer with more than five regular employees and/or twelve or more other workers for seasonal agricultural labor lasting thirty days or more is required to carry workers' compensation coverage.
Active - [57]California Insurance Code Section 11770 (State Compensation Insurance Fund)(opens the original record on California Legislative Information (California Legislature))California Legislative Information (California Legislature)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended by the Legislature; verify current text at leginfo.ID
ca-ins-code-11770What this source supports (2)
- Insurance Code section 11770(a) provides that the State Compensation Insurance Fund is continued in existence, to be administered by its board of directors, for the purpose of transacting workers compensation insurance.
- The stated statutory purposes also include insurance against the expense of defending any suit for serious and willful misconduct against an employer or the employer's agent, and insurance to employees and other persons of the compensation fixed by the workers compensation laws for employees and their dependents.
Published: 2012-06-27 Effective: 2012-06-27
Active - [58]Commissioner Lara takes action to maintain stable workers' compensation market amid rising costs (Release 024-2026)(opens the original record on California Department of Insurance)California Department of InsuranceRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: CDI issues a pure premium rate decision at least annually; the figures change each cycle, so re-check before each content review.ID
cdi-release-024-2026What this source supports (7)
- The Insurance Commissioner adopted a workers' compensation insurance average advisory pure premium rate of $1.65 per $100 of payroll, a 6.6 percent increase from the 2025 approved rate.
- The release states that the new rate will be effective on September 1, 2026.
- The release states that the adopted rate is below the 10.4 percent requested rate increase of the Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau.
- The release states that the adopted rate is advisory, meaning that insurance companies are not bound by it and are free to set their own rates.
- The release states that the adopted rate is in line with the analysis and recommendation of Department of Insurance actuaries reviewing the WCIRB filing.
- The California Insurance Commissioner adopted an average advisory workers compensation pure premium rate of $1.65 per $100 of payroll effective September 1, 2026, a 6.6 percent increase from the 2025 approved rate.
- The Department states that the adopted rate is advisory, meaning that insurance companies are not bound by it and are free to set their own rates.
Published: 2026-07-10 Effective: 2026-09-01
Active - [59]State Fund Facts(opens the original record on State Compensation Insurance Fund)State Compensation Insurance FundCarrier officialPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Carrier-maintained page; content changes without notice.ID
statefund-fact-sheetWhat this source supports (3)
- State Compensation Insurance Fund states on its own fact sheet that it was established in 1914 by the state legislature.
- State Fund describes itself as completely self-supporting and as maintaining an open door policy so that all employers have a strong and stable option for their workers compensation needs.
- State Fund describes itself as the only workers' compensation provider with a commitment to providing workers' compensation insurance to all California businesses, from the smallest start-up to the largest operations. This is the carrier's own characterization of itself, not an independently verified fact.
Active - [60]California Insurance Code Section 384 - statements required on a certificate of insurance(opens the original record on California Legislative Information (California Legislature))California Legislative Information (California Legislature)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended only by the California Legislature; recheck leginfo for current text.ID
ca-ins-code-384What this source supports (5)
- Section 384(a) applies to a certificate of insurance or verification of insurance provided as evidence of insurance in lieu of an actual copy of the insurance policy.
- Section 384(a) requires that such a certificate contain the following statements, or words to the effect of, that it is not an insurance policy and does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies listed herein. The statute requires statements to the effect of that language; it does not mandate one exact sentence.
- Section 384(a) also requires wording to the effect that, notwithstanding any requirement, term, or condition of any contract or other document with respect to which the certificate or verification may be issued or may pertain, the insurance afforded by the policies described is subject to all the terms, exclusions and conditions of the policies.
- Section 384(b) states that the section is not applicable to a surplus line broker certificate as defined in Section 48.
- The section page shows the history line: Amended by Stats. 2000, Ch. 135, Sec. 107. Effective January 1, 2001.
Fetched 2026-08-31 from the official leginfo section page and read in full. Confirmed on the page that the statute uses the phrase 'or words to the effect of' and that it applies to a certificate provided 'in lieu of an actual copy of the insurance policy.' Correcting an earlier note: the section page does carry a history line, '(Amended by Stats. 2000, Ch. 135, Sec. 107. Effective January 1, 2001.)', so effectiveDate is set to 2001-01-01, the effective date of the last amendment shown. publishedDate remains unknown because the page gives a statutes chapter year but no publication date, matching how the other leginfo records in this file are handled. Effective: 2001-01-01
Active - [61]Texas Insurance Code Section 1811.051 - Altering, Amending, or Extending the Terms of an Insurance Policy; Contractual Rights of Certificate Holder(opens the original record on Public.Law (unofficial reproduction of the Texas Insurance Code))Public.Law (unofficial reproduction of the Texas Insurance Code)Primary lawPrimaryJurisdiction TXThird-party reproductionLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Amended only by the Texas Legislature; recheck against statutes.capitol.texas.gov when that site returns statutory text.ID
tx-ins-code-1811-051What this source supports (6)
- Section 1811.051(a) provides that a property or casualty insurer or agent may not issue a certificate of insurance or any other type of document purporting to be a certificate of insurance if the certificate or document alters, amends, or extends the coverage or terms and conditions provided by the insurance policy referenced on the certificate or document.
- Section 1811.051(b) provides that a certificate of insurance or any other type of document may not convey a contractual right to a certificate holder.
- The section is titled 'Altering, Amending, or Extending the Terms of an Insurance Policy; Contractual Rights of Certificate Holder.'
- The page carries the history note: Added by Acts 2011, 82nd Leg., R.S., Ch. 1212 (S.B. 425), Sec. 1, eff. September 1, 2011.
- A property or casualty insurer or agent may not issue a certificate of insurance or any other type of document purporting to be a certificate of insurance if the certificate or document alters, amends, or extends the coverage or terms and conditions provided by the insurance policy referenced on the certificate or document.
- A certificate of insurance or any other type of document may not convey a contractual right to a certificate holder.
Unofficial host. Public.Law is an independent private publisher, not the Texas Legislature; the official citation is Tex. Ins. Code Sec. 1811.051. Fetched 2026-08-31 and read subsections (a) and (b) verbatim along with the history note. The official page at https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/IN/htm/IN.1811.htm was retested on 2026-08-31 and returned only site navigation rather than statutory text, which is why this reproduction is cited. primary is set to false because this is a secondary reproduction of primary law. Published: 2011-09-01 Effective: 2011-09-01
ActiveReproduction - [62]Bulletin 21-EX-5: Certificates of Insurance(opens the original record on Georgia Office of Commissioner of Insurance and Safety Fire)Georgia Office of Commissioner of Insurance and Safety FireRegulatorPrimaryJurisdiction GALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Superseded only if the Commissioner issues a replacement bulletin.ID
ga-oci-bulletin-21-ex-5What this source supports (5)
- The bulletin states that a certificate is not an insurance policy and cannot be used to alter or expand coverage.
- The bulletin states that certificates must be issued on ACORD or ISO forms or on other forms approved explicitly by the Commissioner of Insurance, that certificate forms cannot be altered, and that they must contain this disclaimer language: 'This certificate of insurance is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. This certificate does not amend, extend or alter the coverage, terms exclusions and conditions afforded by the policies referenced herein.'
- The bulletin states that it is a violation of the law to provide a certificate on an unapproved or altered form or to include information on a certificate that purports to alter or expand coverage, that it is also a violation of the law to request such a certificate, and that fines can be up to $5,000 for each violation of the law.
- The bulletin quotes the statutory definition of a certificate of insurance at OCGA section 33-24-19.1(a)(1) as any document or instrument, no matter how titled or described, prepared or issued by an insurer or insurance producer as evidence of property or casualty insurance coverage, excluding a policy of insurance or insurance binder and any insurance information card or identification card issued in conjunction with a motor vehicle insurance policy.
- The bulletin states that the law governing certificates and relevant regulations applies to all certificate holders, to those who request certificates be issued, and to policyholders, insurers, insurance producers, and certificate forms issued as evidence of coverage on property, operations, or risks located in Georgia, regardless of where those parties are located.
Downloaded 2026-08-31; the URL returns a PDF, which was converted with pdftotext -layout and read in full. The bulletin is dated MARCH 11, 2021, is addressed to all Georgia insurers, agents, policyholders and certificate of insurance holders, and is from John F. King, Insurance and Safety Fire Commissioner. All quoted language above was read verbatim from the extracted text. Published: 2021-03-11 Effective: 2021-03-11
Active - [63]Form WC 00 03 13 (Ed. 4-84), Waiver Of Our Right To Recover From Others Endorsement(opens the original record on National Council on Compensation Insurance (form text), posted by the Wisconsin Compensation Rating Bureau)National Council on Compensation Insurance (form text), posted by the Wisconsin Compensation Rating BureauStandards bodyPrimaryJurisdiction n/aLast checked August 31, 2026Updates: The underlying form is maintained by its filer; rating bureau postings change as filings change.ID
wcrb-wc-00-03-13What this source supports (4)
- The form is designated WC 00 03 13 (Ed. 4-84), attaches to a Workers Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance Policy, and carries the footer '1983 National Council on Compensation Insurance.'
- The form reads: 'We have the right to recover our payments from anyone liable for an injury covered by this policy. We will not enforce our right against the person or organization named in the Schedule. (This agreement applies only to the extent that you perform work under a written contract that requires you to obtain this agreement from us.)'
- The form also states: 'This agreement shall not operate directly or indirectly to benefit anyone not named in the Schedule.'
- The form contains a Schedule in which the person or organization is named.
Downloaded 2026-08-31; the URL returns a one-page PDF, converted with pdftotext -layout and read in full. This is a clean, unaltered copy of the national workers compensation waiver endorsement, used in place of a municipal sample packet copy for better provenance on this form's text. The Wisconsin Compensation Rating Bureau is the posting organization, not the form's filer.
Active - [64]In the Matter of the Appeal of E M Machining, from a Decision of the Workers' Compensation Insurance Rating Bureau, File ALB-WCA-00-30, Proposed Decision(opens the original record on California Department of Insurance, Administrative Hearing Bureau)California Department of Insurance, Administrative Hearing BureauRegulatorSecondaryJurisdiction CALast checked August 31, 2026Updates: Adjudicative record; not updated. Rate figures and Plan section citations reflect the 2000 edition of the Plan.ID
cdi-ahb-em-machining-2001What this source supports (11)
- The document is captioned PROPOSED DECISION, is dated October 23, 2001, and closes with the administrative law judge stating that he submits the proposed decision and recommends its adoption as the decision of the Insurance Commissioner of the State of California.
- Footnote 1: the WCIRB is a rating organization licensed by the Insurance Commissioner under Insurance Code section 11750 et seq. to assist the Commissioner in the development and administration of workers' compensation insurance classification and rating systems, and the WCIRB serves as the Commissioner's designated statistical agent for the purpose of gathering and compiling experience data developed under California workers' compensation and employers' liability insurance policies (Ins. Code 11751.5).
- The decision states that generally it is the business of the employer within California that is classified, not the separate employments, occupations or operations within the business, citing the Plan, Part 3.
- Footnote 7: rate, as used in the Plan, means the cost of the insurance per unit of exposure (payroll) prior to any application of individual risk variations based on loss or expense considerations applicable to an insurer's classification.
- The decision states that the rate for each classification reflects the payroll data and loss history associated with the particular operations assigned to that classification, so that if the operations assigned to a classification have a high loss history the rate for that classification will tend to be higher.
- Footnote 8: under the 2000 version of the Plan, the pure premium rate per $100.00 of payroll for classification 0106, Tree Pruning Repairing or Trimming, is $31.86, and the pure premium rate for classification 8810, Clerical Office Employees, is $.76.
- Footnote 6: an insurer may develop and file with the Department of Insurance its own classification system upon which a rate may be made, or may alternatively incorporate the WCIRB's classification system and develop rates based on the pure premium rates in the Plan; in any event the insurer's rate filing is subject to the Commissioner's disapproval (Insurance Code section 11734(b)).
- The carrier's underwriting department contacted the WCIRB and requested that the WCIRB conduct a physical inspection of the employer's plant to verify whether the operations were properly assigned; following its inspection the WCIRB issued a Classification Inspection Report dated August 4, 2000, and later a second Classification Inspection Report, reassigning the operations.
- Under California Code of Regulations, title 10, section 2509.61(a), a party has the burden of proof as to each fact the existence or nonexistence of which is essential to the claim for relief or defense that he or she is asserting.
- The administrative law judge concluded that the WCIRB met its burden by showing the end product, employee skills, raw materials and type and use of equipment were more like those of the compared industry, and ordered that the WCIRB's determination assigning the employer's operations to classification 3643(1) is affirmed.
- The decision records that the carrier initially charged the employer $2.17 per $100.00 of payroll under classification 3681 and that the rate was raised to $4.57 per $100.00 of payroll after reassignment to classification 3643(1), so that the employer's premium more than doubled.
Re-fetched and re-verified 2026-08-31 over HTTPS (HTTP 200, 680,429 bytes); text extracted with pdftotext and read directly. Every claim above was read in the extracted text. Standing corrections: (1) the document is a PROPOSED decision that recommends adoption, and the document itself does not evidence adoption, so the publisher label does not say 'precedential decisions collection', sourceType is regulator-record rather than regulator-guidance, and primary is false; the proposed-decision status is stated in the first claim and in the prose. (2) The decision's footnote 3 cites the Plan as incorporated at Title 10 CCR section 2353.1; the current Plan is cited at Title 10 CCR section 2318.6 and 2353.1 is the Experience Rating Plan, so this source is NOT used for the Plan's CCR section number. (3) The decision quotes the appeal provision as Insurance Code section 11737(c); the current statute carries it at subdivision (f), so the subdivision letter is sourced to the statute, not to this decision. New on this pass: the inspection-report claim was corrected from a bare plural to the record's actual sequence (a report dated August 4, 2000 and a later second report), and the $2.17 / $4.57 insurer-rate figures were added because the prose's point about the size of a reassignment is better carried by them; all dollar figures from this document are labeled as from the 2000 edition and are historical. URL RE-CHECKED 2026-08-31: HTTP 200, no redirect, 680,429 bytes. Re-confirmed today in the extracted text: PROPOSED DECISION and the recommendation of adoption, the October 23, 2001 date, Insurance Code sections 11750 and 11751.5, section 11734(b), the $31.86 and $.76 pure premium rates, the $2.17 and $4.57 insurer rates, classification 3643(1), the August 4, 2000 inspection report, Title 10 CCR section 2509.61, and the section 2353.1 citation that underlies standing correction (2). The decision's own text again reads 'section 11737 (c)', confirming standing correction (3): the current statute carries that language at subdivision (f). Published: 2001-10-23
Active